From: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Antonio Borneo <antonio.borneo@st.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tracing: Fix printing ptrs in preempt/irq enable/disable events
Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2019 18:47:41 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191221234741.GA116648@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191204092115.30ef75c9@gandalf.local.home>
On Wed, Dec 04, 2019 at 09:21:15AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> Joel,
>
> Any comments on this patch?
Steve, it looks like this issue happens with trace-cmd not knowing what
_stext is. If I do cat trace_pipe , then I don't see the issue as _stext is
looked up correctly but the reporter of the bug is using trace-cmd. Is there
a way to solve this within trace-cmd? Not knowing much about trace-cmd
internals, I will have to defer to you on this though..
Other than this, I need to make the offset to _stext as s32 instead of u32
type so that the problem of the symbol location being before _stext does not
cause overflow.
Lastly, I am not super convinced that we need to store the full pointer just
to handle a case where the offset of the symbol might be more than +-2G from
_stext. Once we see such issue, then we can handle it. But right now the size
of the trace buffer is utilized better by just storing the offset IMHO.
thanks,
- Joel
>
> -- Steve
>
> On Wed, 27 Nov 2019 16:44:28 +0100
> Antonio Borneo <antonio.borneo@st.com> wrote:
>
> > This tracing event class is the only instance in kernel that logs
> > in the trace buffer the instruction pointer as offset to _stext,
> > instead of logging the full pointer.
> > This looks like a nice optimization for 64 bits platforms, where a
> > 32 bit offset can take less space than a full 64 bits pointer. But
> > the symbol _stext is incorrectly resolved as zero in the expansion
> > of TP_printk(), which then prints only the hex offset instead of
> > the name of the caller function. Plus, on arm arch the kernel
> > modules are loaded at address lower than _stext, causing the u32
> > offset arithmetics to overflow and wrap at 32 bits.
> > I did not identified a 64 bit arch where the modules are loaded at
> > offset from _stext that exceed u32 range, but I also did not
> > identified any constraint to feel safe with a u32 offset.
> >
> > Log directly the instruction pointer instead of the offset to
> > _stext.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Antonio Borneo <antonio.borneo@st.com>
> > Fixes: d59158162e03 ("tracing: Add support for preempt and irq enable/disable events")
> > ---
> > include/trace/events/preemptirq.h | 12 ++++++------
> > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/trace/events/preemptirq.h b/include/trace/events/preemptirq.h
> > index 95fba0471e5b..d548a6aafa18 100644
> > --- a/include/trace/events/preemptirq.h
> > +++ b/include/trace/events/preemptirq.h
> > @@ -18,18 +18,18 @@ DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(preemptirq_template,
> > TP_ARGS(ip, parent_ip),
> >
> > TP_STRUCT__entry(
> > - __field(u32, caller_offs)
> > - __field(u32, parent_offs)
> > + __field(unsigned long, caller_ip)
> > + __field(unsigned long, parent_ip)
> > ),
> >
> > TP_fast_assign(
> > - __entry->caller_offs = (u32)(ip - (unsigned long)_stext);
> > - __entry->parent_offs = (u32)(parent_ip - (unsigned long)_stext);
> > + __entry->caller_ip = ip;
> > + __entry->parent_ip = parent_ip;
> > ),
> >
> > TP_printk("caller=%pS parent=%pS",
> > - (void *)((unsigned long)(_stext) + __entry->caller_offs),
> > - (void *)((unsigned long)(_stext) + __entry->parent_offs))
> > + (void *)__entry->caller_ip,
> > + (void *)__entry->parent_ip)
> > );
> >
> > #ifdef CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-12-21 23:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-27 15:44 [PATCH] tracing: Fix printing ptrs in preempt/irq enable/disable events Antonio Borneo
2019-12-04 14:21 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-12-04 16:04 ` Joel Fernandes
2019-12-21 23:47 ` Joel Fernandes [this message]
2019-12-23 20:13 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-12-23 20:18 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-01-02 19:53 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-01-07 9:21 ` Antonio Borneo
2020-01-07 14:22 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-12-04 16:04 ` Joel Fernandes
2019-12-07 0:00 ` Antonio Borneo
2019-12-19 18:45 ` Valentin Schneider
2019-12-21 23:27 ` Joel Fernandes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191221234741.GA116648@google.com \
--to=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=antonio.borneo@st.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox