From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759951AbYDKK2u (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Apr 2008 06:28:50 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1758899AbYDKK2n (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Apr 2008 06:28:43 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:37891 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758878AbYDKK2m (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Apr 2008 06:28:42 -0400 Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd. Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom. Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903 From: David Howells In-Reply-To: <20080411.031642.193716019.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20080411.031642.193716019.davem@davemloft.net> <1207885132.22001.85.camel@brick> <15208.1207908688@redhat.com> To: David Miller Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, harvey.harrison@gmail.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] kernel: Move arches to use common unaligned access X-Mailer: MH-E 8.0.3+cvs; nmh 1.2-20070115cvs; GNU Emacs 23.0.50 Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2008 11:27:55 +0100 Message-ID: <20196.1207909675@redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org David Miller wrote: > No, I think it has something to do with what cases GCC is allowed to > optimize the call inline and what cases it cannot wrt. alignment of > datums. As he says in his comment, in fact. David