* [PATCH v2 0/2] iommu/vt-d: Introduce rbtree for probed devices
@ 2024-02-20 6:59 Lu Baolu
2024-02-20 6:59 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] iommu/vt-d: Use rbtree to track iommu " Lu Baolu
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Lu Baolu @ 2024-02-20 6:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Joerg Roedel, Will Deacon, Robin Murphy, Jason Gunthorpe,
Kevin Tian
Cc: Huang Jiaqing, Ethan Zhao, iommu, linux-kernel, Lu Baolu
This is a follow-up to the discussion thread here:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/20240201193427.GQ50608@ziepe.ca/
This proposes a per-IOMMU red-black tree for iommu probed devices. It
benefits fault handling paths, where the VT-d hardware reports the
Source ID of the related device, and software needs to retrieve the
corresponding device pointer based on this ID.
This is also available at github:
https://github.com/LuBaolu/intel-iommu/commits/rbtree-for-device-info-v2
Change log:
v2:
- Drop get/put_device() in device_rbtree_find();
- Add a mutex to synchronize iopf report and device release paths.
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/20240215072249.4465-1-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com/
Lu Baolu (2):
iommu/vt-d: Use rbtree to track iommu probed devices
iommu/vt-d: Use device rbtree in iopf reporting path
drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.h | 10 ++++
drivers/iommu/intel/dmar.c | 4 +-
drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c | 91 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
drivers/iommu/intel/svm.c | 17 +++----
4 files changed, 111 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/2] iommu/vt-d: Use rbtree to track iommu probed devices
2024-02-20 6:59 [PATCH v2 0/2] iommu/vt-d: Introduce rbtree for probed devices Lu Baolu
@ 2024-02-20 6:59 ` Lu Baolu
2024-02-20 6:59 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] iommu/vt-d: Use device rbtree in iopf reporting path Lu Baolu
2024-02-26 6:15 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] iommu/vt-d: Introduce rbtree for probed devices Baolu Lu
2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Lu Baolu @ 2024-02-20 6:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Joerg Roedel, Will Deacon, Robin Murphy, Jason Gunthorpe,
Kevin Tian
Cc: Huang Jiaqing, Ethan Zhao, iommu, linux-kernel, Lu Baolu,
Jason Gunthorpe
Use a red-black tree(rbtree) to track devices probed by the driver's
probe_device callback. These devices need to be looked up quickly by
a source ID when the hardware reports a fault, either recoverable or
unrecoverable.
Fault reporting paths are critical. Searching a list in this scenario
is inefficient, with an algorithm complexity of O(n). An rbtree is a
self-balancing binary search tree, offering an average search time
complexity of O(log(n)). This significant performance improvement
makes rbtrees a better choice.
Furthermore, rbtrees are implemented on a per-iommu basis, eliminating
the need for global searches and further enhancing efficiency in
critical fault paths. The rbtree is protected by a spin lock with
interrupts disabled to ensure thread-safe access even within interrupt
contexts.
Co-developed-by: Huang Jiaqing <jiaqing.huang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Huang Jiaqing <jiaqing.huang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
---
drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.h | 8 ++++
drivers/iommu/intel/dmar.c | 3 +-
drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c | 88 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
3 files changed, 96 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.h b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.h
index eaef932ad7c9..2b67ad0d6fe9 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.h
+++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.h
@@ -722,6 +722,11 @@ struct intel_iommu {
struct q_inval *qi; /* Queued invalidation info */
u32 iommu_state[MAX_SR_DMAR_REGS]; /* Store iommu states between suspend and resume.*/
+ /* rb tree for all probed devices */
+ struct rb_root device_rbtree;
+ /* protect the device_rbtree */
+ spinlock_t device_rbtree_lock;
+
#ifdef CONFIG_IRQ_REMAP
struct ir_table *ir_table; /* Interrupt remapping info */
struct irq_domain *ir_domain;
@@ -755,6 +760,8 @@ struct device_domain_info {
struct intel_iommu *iommu; /* IOMMU used by this device */
struct dmar_domain *domain; /* pointer to domain */
struct pasid_table *pasid_table; /* pasid table */
+ /* device tracking node(lookup by PCI RID) */
+ struct rb_node node;
#ifdef CONFIG_INTEL_IOMMU_DEBUGFS
struct dentry *debugfs_dentry; /* pointer to device directory dentry */
#endif
@@ -1081,6 +1088,7 @@ void free_pgtable_page(void *vaddr);
void iommu_flush_write_buffer(struct intel_iommu *iommu);
struct iommu_domain *intel_nested_domain_alloc(struct iommu_domain *parent,
const struct iommu_user_data *user_data);
+struct device *device_rbtree_find(struct intel_iommu *iommu, u16 rid);
#ifdef CONFIG_INTEL_IOMMU_SVM
void intel_svm_check(struct intel_iommu *iommu);
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/dmar.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/dmar.c
index 23cb80d62a9a..f9b63c2875f7 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/intel/dmar.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/dmar.c
@@ -1095,7 +1095,8 @@ static int alloc_iommu(struct dmar_drhd_unit *drhd)
iommu->agaw = agaw;
iommu->msagaw = msagaw;
iommu->segment = drhd->segment;
-
+ iommu->device_rbtree = RB_ROOT;
+ spin_lock_init(&iommu->device_rbtree_lock);
iommu->node = NUMA_NO_NODE;
ver = readl(iommu->reg + DMAR_VER_REG);
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
index 61bb35046ea4..acfe27bd3448 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
@@ -96,6 +96,81 @@ static phys_addr_t root_entry_uctp(struct root_entry *re)
return re->hi & VTD_PAGE_MASK;
}
+static int device_rid_cmp_key(const void *key, const struct rb_node *node)
+{
+ struct device_domain_info *info =
+ rb_entry(node, struct device_domain_info, node);
+ const u16 *rid_lhs = key;
+
+ if (*rid_lhs < PCI_DEVID(info->bus, info->devfn))
+ return -1;
+
+ if (*rid_lhs > PCI_DEVID(info->bus, info->devfn))
+ return 1;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int device_rid_cmp(struct rb_node *lhs, const struct rb_node *rhs)
+{
+ struct device_domain_info *info =
+ rb_entry(lhs, struct device_domain_info, node);
+ u16 key = PCI_DEVID(info->bus, info->devfn);
+
+ return device_rid_cmp_key(&key, rhs);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Looks up an IOMMU-probed device using its source ID.
+ *
+ * Returns the pointer to the device if there is a match. Otherwise,
+ * returns NULL.
+ *
+ * Note that this helper doesn't guarantee that the device won't be
+ * released by the iommu subsystem after being returned. The caller
+ * should use its own synchronization mechanism to avoid the device
+ * being released during its use if its possibly the case.
+ */
+struct device *device_rbtree_find(struct intel_iommu *iommu, u16 rid)
+{
+ struct device_domain_info *info = NULL;
+ struct rb_node *node;
+ unsigned long flags;
+
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&iommu->device_rbtree_lock, flags);
+ node = rb_find(&rid, &iommu->device_rbtree, device_rid_cmp_key);
+ if (node)
+ info = rb_entry(node, struct device_domain_info, node);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&iommu->device_rbtree_lock, flags);
+
+ return info ? info->dev : NULL;
+}
+
+static int device_rbtree_insert(struct intel_iommu *iommu,
+ struct device_domain_info *info)
+{
+ struct rb_node *curr;
+ unsigned long flags;
+
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&iommu->device_rbtree_lock, flags);
+ curr = rb_find_add(&info->node, &iommu->device_rbtree, device_rid_cmp);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&iommu->device_rbtree_lock, flags);
+ if (WARN_ON(curr))
+ return -EEXIST;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static void device_rbtree_remove(struct device_domain_info *info)
+{
+ struct intel_iommu *iommu = info->iommu;
+ unsigned long flags;
+
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&iommu->device_rbtree_lock, flags);
+ rb_erase(&info->node, &iommu->device_rbtree);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&iommu->device_rbtree_lock, flags);
+}
+
/*
* This domain is a statically identity mapping domain.
* 1. This domain creats a static 1:1 mapping to all usable memory.
@@ -4329,25 +4404,34 @@ static struct iommu_device *intel_iommu_probe_device(struct device *dev)
}
dev_iommu_priv_set(dev, info);
+ ret = device_rbtree_insert(iommu, info);
+ if (ret)
+ goto free;
if (sm_supported(iommu) && !dev_is_real_dma_subdevice(dev)) {
ret = intel_pasid_alloc_table(dev);
if (ret) {
dev_err(dev, "PASID table allocation failed\n");
- kfree(info);
- return ERR_PTR(ret);
+ goto clear_rbtree;
}
}
intel_iommu_debugfs_create_dev(info);
return &iommu->iommu;
+clear_rbtree:
+ device_rbtree_remove(info);
+free:
+ kfree(info);
+
+ return ERR_PTR(ret);
}
static void intel_iommu_release_device(struct device *dev)
{
struct device_domain_info *info = dev_iommu_priv_get(dev);
+ device_rbtree_remove(info);
dmar_remove_one_dev_info(dev);
intel_pasid_free_table(dev);
intel_iommu_debugfs_remove_dev(info);
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 2/2] iommu/vt-d: Use device rbtree in iopf reporting path
2024-02-20 6:59 [PATCH v2 0/2] iommu/vt-d: Introduce rbtree for probed devices Lu Baolu
2024-02-20 6:59 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] iommu/vt-d: Use rbtree to track iommu " Lu Baolu
@ 2024-02-20 6:59 ` Lu Baolu
2024-02-21 15:34 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-02-26 6:15 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] iommu/vt-d: Introduce rbtree for probed devices Baolu Lu
2 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Lu Baolu @ 2024-02-20 6:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Joerg Roedel, Will Deacon, Robin Murphy, Jason Gunthorpe,
Kevin Tian
Cc: Huang Jiaqing, Ethan Zhao, iommu, linux-kernel, Lu Baolu
The existing I/O page fault handler currently locates the PCI device by
calling pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot(). This function searches the list
of all PCI devices until the desired device is found. To improve lookup
efficiency, replace it with device_rbtree_find() to search the device
within the probed device rbtree.
The I/O page fault is initiated by the device, which does not have any
synchronization mechanism with the software to ensure that the device
stays in the probed device tree. Theoretically, a device could be released
by the IOMMU subsystem after device_rbtree_find() and before
iopf_get_dev_fault_param(), which would cause a use-after-free problem.
Add a mutex to synchronize the I/O page fault reporting path and the IOMMU
release device path. This lock doesn't introduce any performance overhead,
as the conflict between I/O page fault reporting and device releasing is
very rare.
Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.h | 2 ++
drivers/iommu/intel/dmar.c | 1 +
drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c | 3 +++
drivers/iommu/intel/svm.c | 17 +++++++++--------
4 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.h b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.h
index 2b67ad0d6fe9..404d2476a877 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.h
+++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.h
@@ -719,6 +719,8 @@ struct intel_iommu {
#endif
struct iopf_queue *iopf_queue;
unsigned char iopfq_name[16];
+ /* Synchronization between fault report and iommu device release. */
+ struct mutex iopf_lock;
struct q_inval *qi; /* Queued invalidation info */
u32 iommu_state[MAX_SR_DMAR_REGS]; /* Store iommu states between suspend and resume.*/
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/dmar.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/dmar.c
index f9b63c2875f7..d14797aabb7a 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/intel/dmar.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/dmar.c
@@ -1097,6 +1097,7 @@ static int alloc_iommu(struct dmar_drhd_unit *drhd)
iommu->segment = drhd->segment;
iommu->device_rbtree = RB_ROOT;
spin_lock_init(&iommu->device_rbtree_lock);
+ mutex_init(&iommu->iopf_lock);
iommu->node = NUMA_NO_NODE;
ver = readl(iommu->reg + DMAR_VER_REG);
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
index acfe27bd3448..6743fe6c7a36 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
@@ -4430,8 +4430,11 @@ static struct iommu_device *intel_iommu_probe_device(struct device *dev)
static void intel_iommu_release_device(struct device *dev)
{
struct device_domain_info *info = dev_iommu_priv_get(dev);
+ struct intel_iommu *iommu = info->iommu;
+ mutex_lock(&iommu->iopf_lock);
device_rbtree_remove(info);
+ mutex_unlock(&iommu->iopf_lock);
dmar_remove_one_dev_info(dev);
intel_pasid_free_table(dev);
intel_iommu_debugfs_remove_dev(info);
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/svm.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/svm.c
index b644d57da841..dda276e28325 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/intel/svm.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/svm.c
@@ -645,7 +645,7 @@ static irqreturn_t prq_event_thread(int irq, void *d)
struct intel_iommu *iommu = d;
struct page_req_dsc *req;
int head, tail, handled;
- struct pci_dev *pdev;
+ struct device *dev;
u64 address;
/*
@@ -691,21 +691,22 @@ static irqreturn_t prq_event_thread(int irq, void *d)
if (unlikely(req->lpig && !req->rd_req && !req->wr_req))
goto prq_advance;
- pdev = pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot(iommu->segment,
- PCI_BUS_NUM(req->rid),
- req->rid & 0xff);
/*
* If prq is to be handled outside iommu driver via receiver of
* the fault notifiers, we skip the page response here.
*/
- if (!pdev)
+ mutex_lock(&iommu->iopf_lock);
+ dev = device_rbtree_find(iommu, req->rid);
+ if (!dev) {
+ mutex_unlock(&iommu->iopf_lock);
goto bad_req;
+ }
- intel_svm_prq_report(iommu, &pdev->dev, req);
- trace_prq_report(iommu, &pdev->dev, req->qw_0, req->qw_1,
+ intel_svm_prq_report(iommu, dev, req);
+ trace_prq_report(iommu, dev, req->qw_0, req->qw_1,
req->priv_data[0], req->priv_data[1],
iommu->prq_seq_number++);
- pci_dev_put(pdev);
+ mutex_unlock(&iommu->iopf_lock);
prq_advance:
head = (head + sizeof(*req)) & PRQ_RING_MASK;
}
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] iommu/vt-d: Use device rbtree in iopf reporting path
2024-02-20 6:59 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] iommu/vt-d: Use device rbtree in iopf reporting path Lu Baolu
@ 2024-02-21 15:34 ` Jason Gunthorpe
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jason Gunthorpe @ 2024-02-21 15:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lu Baolu
Cc: Joerg Roedel, Will Deacon, Robin Murphy, Kevin Tian,
Huang Jiaqing, Ethan Zhao, iommu, linux-kernel
On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 02:59:39PM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
> index acfe27bd3448..6743fe6c7a36 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
> @@ -4430,8 +4430,11 @@ static struct iommu_device *intel_iommu_probe_device(struct device *dev)
> static void intel_iommu_release_device(struct device *dev)
> {
> struct device_domain_info *info = dev_iommu_priv_get(dev);
> + struct intel_iommu *iommu = info->iommu;
>
> + mutex_lock(&iommu->iopf_lock);
> device_rbtree_remove(info);
> + mutex_unlock(&iommu->iopf_lock);
This seems like a pretty reasonable solution, maybe someday it can
become lockless.. This is a fast path right?
> @@ -691,21 +691,22 @@ static irqreturn_t prq_event_thread(int irq, void *d)
> if (unlikely(req->lpig && !req->rd_req && !req->wr_req))
> goto prq_advance;
>
> - pdev = pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot(iommu->segment,
> - PCI_BUS_NUM(req->rid),
> - req->rid & 0xff);
> /*
> * If prq is to be handled outside iommu driver via receiver of
> * the fault notifiers, we skip the page response here.
> */
> - if (!pdev)
> + mutex_lock(&iommu->iopf_lock);
> + dev = device_rbtree_find(iommu, req->rid);
> + if (!dev) {
> + mutex_unlock(&iommu->iopf_lock);
> goto bad_req;
> + }
Though now we have a mutex and a spinlock covering the same data
structure.. It could be optimized some more.
But maybe we should leave micro optimization aside for now.
Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Jason
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] iommu/vt-d: Introduce rbtree for probed devices
2024-02-20 6:59 [PATCH v2 0/2] iommu/vt-d: Introduce rbtree for probed devices Lu Baolu
2024-02-20 6:59 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] iommu/vt-d: Use rbtree to track iommu " Lu Baolu
2024-02-20 6:59 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] iommu/vt-d: Use device rbtree in iopf reporting path Lu Baolu
@ 2024-02-26 6:15 ` Baolu Lu
2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Baolu Lu @ 2024-02-26 6:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Joerg Roedel, Will Deacon, Robin Murphy, Jason Gunthorpe,
Kevin Tian
Cc: baolu.lu, Huang Jiaqing, Ethan Zhao, iommu, linux-kernel
On 2/20/24 2:59 PM, Lu Baolu wrote:
> This is a follow-up to the discussion thread here:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/20240201193427.GQ50608@ziepe.ca/
>
> This proposes a per-IOMMU red-black tree for iommu probed devices. It
> benefits fault handling paths, where the VT-d hardware reports the
> Source ID of the related device, and software needs to retrieve the
> corresponding device pointer based on this ID.
>
> This is also available at github:
>
> https://github.com/LuBaolu/intel-iommu/commits/rbtree-for-device-info-v2
>
> Change log:
>
> v2:
> - Drop get/put_device() in device_rbtree_find();
> - Add a mutex to synchronize iopf report and device release paths.
>
> v1:https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/20240215072249.4465-1-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com/
>
> Lu Baolu (2):
> iommu/vt-d: Use rbtree to track iommu probed devices
> iommu/vt-d: Use device rbtree in iopf reporting path
Above queued for v6.9.
Best regards,
baolu
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-02-26 6:21 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-02-20 6:59 [PATCH v2 0/2] iommu/vt-d: Introduce rbtree for probed devices Lu Baolu
2024-02-20 6:59 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] iommu/vt-d: Use rbtree to track iommu " Lu Baolu
2024-02-20 6:59 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] iommu/vt-d: Use device rbtree in iopf reporting path Lu Baolu
2024-02-21 15:34 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2024-02-26 6:15 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] iommu/vt-d: Introduce rbtree for probed devices Baolu Lu
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox