From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E75CDC3276D for ; Thu, 2 Jan 2020 16:21:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE9BE215A4 for ; Thu, 2 Jan 2020 16:21:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728839AbgABQVk (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Jan 2020 11:21:40 -0500 Received: from asavdk4.altibox.net ([109.247.116.15]:49852 "EHLO asavdk4.altibox.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728678AbgABQVj (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Jan 2020 11:21:39 -0500 Received: from ravnborg.org (unknown [158.248.194.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by asavdk4.altibox.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ECD25804DA; Thu, 2 Jan 2020 17:21:35 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2020 17:21:34 +0100 From: Sam Ravnborg To: Lee Jones Cc: Claudiu Beznea , boris.brezillon@bootlin.com, airlied@linux.ie, nicolas.ferre@microchip.com, alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com, peda@axentia.se, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] fixes for atmel-hlcdc Message-ID: <20200102162134.GA13454@ravnborg.org> References: <1576672109-22707-1-git-send-email-claudiu.beznea@microchip.com> <20200102090554.GB29446@ravnborg.org> <20200102160534.GJ22390@dell> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200102160534.GJ22390@dell> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-CMAE-Score: 0 X-CMAE-Analysis: v=2.3 cv=VcLZwmh9 c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=UWs3HLbX/2nnQ3s7vZ42gw==:117 a=UWs3HLbX/2nnQ3s7vZ42gw==:17 a=jpOVt7BSZ2e4Z31A5e1TngXxSK0=:19 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=sy_eDPmhS6KF6TahjTwA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Lee. > > > ("drm/atmel-hlcdc: allow selecting a higher pixel-clock than requested") > > > > > > Claudiu Beznea (5): > > > drm: atmel-hlcdc: use double rate for pixel clock only if supported > > > drm: atmel-hlcdc: enable clock before configuring timing engine > > > > > mfd: atmel-hlcdc: add struct device member to struct > > > atmel_hlcdc_regmap > > > mfd: atmel-hlcdc: return in case of error > > > > Would it be OK to apply the to drm-misc-next, or shal they go in via > > your mfd tree? > > How are they related to the other patches? Do they have build-time > dependencies on any of the other patches, or vice versa? No build time dependencies. But from the description of "atmel-hlcdc: return in case of error": " For HLCDC timing engine configurations bit ATMEL_HLCDC_SIP of ATMEL_HLCDC_SR needs to be polled before applying new config. " I get that changing timing for the HLCDC may fail if these patches are not applied. So it is only to have updated hlcdc support in drm-misc-next for further testing. Sam