From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB038C33C9B for ; Tue, 7 Jan 2020 18:49:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4C0320848 for ; Tue, 7 Jan 2020 18:49:32 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=alien8.de header.i=@alien8.de header.b="fSPZsoNU" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728582AbgAGStc (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Jan 2020 13:49:32 -0500 Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([5.9.137.197]:45830 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728235AbgAGStb (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Jan 2020 13:49:31 -0500 Received: from zn.tnic (p200300EC2F0FB4001C0F6E794847FFF7.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [IPv6:2003:ec:2f0f:b400:1c0f:6e79:4847:fff7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.skyhub.de (SuperMail on ZX Spectrum 128k) with ESMTPSA id B43D71EC0985; Tue, 7 Jan 2020 19:49:29 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alien8.de; s=dkim; t=1578422969; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references; bh=prJXbdZ0G6DtKTXl0d7vCCyv/ZmBVWRGcQzxuDDAYeA=; b=fSPZsoNUw5Cor3fhNQHJZWrhN/pUgJSB4jeTW3Wf+wrx+3he+2C3DTQ/T7IIXMB6WdDbsH /j4Q4FGTDb9c2eyxKJOR3z7+S4p3580qkHS1/ZX9hX+eALz//AJ1YmY2oxECGMXvcZaNcy j8jphI14T3aOS9rjLIrW8acWzHwsMqw= Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2020 19:49:26 +0100 From: Borislav Petkov To: Scott Branden Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Tony Luck , Yuqing Shen , Lei Wang , James Morse , Robert Richter , BCM Kernel Feedback , LKML Subject: Re: EDAC driver for DMC520 Message-ID: <20200107184926.GL29542@zn.tnic> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jan 07, 2020 at 09:57:26AM -0800, Scott Branden wrote: > Hello EDAC Maintainers, > > Could somebody have a look at the DMC520 patch series that has been waiting > for a response since November: > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11248785/ Well, the dt bindings stuff is still being discussed: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11248783/ Also, looking at this again, the patch authorship looks really fishy: Sender is From: Shiping Ji however, he doesn't have his SOB in there and previous iterations were done with Lei Wang whose SOB *is* there so I dunno what's going on. *Especially* if Lei Wang is being added as a maintainer of that driver by the second patch but he's not sending this driver himself. If this driver is going to be orphaned the moment it lands upstream, I'm not going to take it. So at least those two things need to be fixed/clarified first. HTH. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette