From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4194C33C8C for ; Tue, 7 Jan 2020 12:15:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAB6E206F0 for ; Tue, 7 Jan 2020 12:15:41 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1578399341; bh=d9XX/RSwY9aTTzmpuuE0fOOU68NQ65sLCFSqyCnApLI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:List-ID:From; b=12+d6AqI3U3CiOrEtYLPUnuigDMOo6XWLI04UPVBMISrYFjffYnUKH9FrlUMidogU U4MhK8rcHtOAGrlKHB+wcsnNLOOwCOwWoBieG91HFYMUyW0QLh0m1/yFOnc0a9OHH2 m0FolJLshD9c/Z0z+N9O+RShm0QWbIxJ+JdoK2zc= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728026AbgAGMPk (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Jan 2020 07:15:40 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:59640 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727177AbgAGMPk (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Jan 2020 07:15:40 -0500 Received: from devnote2 (NE2965lan1.rev.em-net.ne.jp [210.141.244.193]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8A1AD206F0; Tue, 7 Jan 2020 12:15:37 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1578399339; bh=d9XX/RSwY9aTTzmpuuE0fOOU68NQ65sLCFSqyCnApLI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=BftntN493z5lsJkr9pUoYnw95G58eH7h8B8YgPKiU3bzTmRgfGoymEp0idHRomryv cW7G+ryqc6XzmRdJTwVMKQTmX8QBZI1StMUiMT9sCrz0ZJHGJdEvqdP8GC4BJ+c/dj 4vrb3zBogmhZ5dd4Z+YGfGevNPSvYzHZrwHTgJN8= Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2020 21:15:35 +0900 From: Masami Hiramatsu To: Masami Hiramatsu Cc: Ingo Molnar , Anders Roxell , paulmck@kernel.org, joel@joelfernandes.org, "Naveen N . Rao" , Anil S Keshavamurthy , David Miller , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip V2 0/2] kprobes: Fix RCU warning and cleanup Message-Id: <20200107211535.233e7ff396f867ee1348178b@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20191221035541.69fc05613351b8dabd6e1a44@kernel.org> References: <157535316659.16485.11817291759382261088.stgit@devnote2> <20191221035541.69fc05613351b8dabd6e1a44@kernel.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.5.1 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello, Anyone have any comment on this series? Without this series, I still see the suspicious RCU warning for kprobe on -tip tree. Thank you, On Sat, 21 Dec 2019 03:55:41 +0900 Masami Hiramatsu wrote: > Hi Ingo, > > Could you pick this series to fix the false-positive RCU-list warnings? > > Thank you, > > On Tue, 3 Dec 2019 15:06:06 +0900 > Masami Hiramatsu wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Here is a couple of patches which fix suspicious RCU > > usage warnings in kprobes. > > > > Anders reported the first warning in kprobe smoke test > > with CONFIG_PROVE_RCU_LIST=y. While fixing this issue, > > I found similar issues and cleanups in kprobes. > > > > Thank you, > > > > --- > > > > Masami Hiramatsu (2): > > kprobes: Suppress the suspicious RCU warning on kprobes > > kprobes: Use non RCU traversal APIs on kprobe_tables if possible > > > > > > kernel/kprobes.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------- > > 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > > > > -- > > Masami Hiramatsu (Linaro) > > > -- > Masami Hiramatsu -- Masami Hiramatsu