From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F347AC33CA2 for ; Thu, 9 Jan 2020 20:15:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6DF620673 for ; Thu, 9 Jan 2020 20:15:12 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1578600912; bh=KiyfMYMXrhCPavLiv7IS4vQXlrZMabiyqWz03OECXzo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=C8KRUb+vfAFOhiHs71uGIeTDtrx6macCliAkg5cvE7WrrpmZN+OuHK7y1wRtBgh16 QpudRbSrScVAdecQtQyqHaelrAxIUobGy5x2KvqgZ2yCdtJdlw4VYVdrT1bSHEJwt/ +xptQmftXvqPV42czrZO28K0v7Fvw3rkDEWedNjw= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729303AbgAIUPM (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Jan 2020 15:15:12 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-f65.google.com ([209.85.221.65]:33615 "EHLO mail-wr1-f65.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727945AbgAIUPL (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Jan 2020 15:15:11 -0500 Received: by mail-wr1-f65.google.com with SMTP id b6so8859927wrq.0 for ; Thu, 09 Jan 2020 12:15:10 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=uTckSan/5pI/VRS4OQ1RRQT5RKbU3mqiEyEpjYqvGTA=; b=mvFVrFU6zFVfRAnWKS3UMoeYdPYzNlgXOHek3lefxUnllBY2X3bNA/EkUIHepxiYgF BxqIvmCx3F9WT6/1gykb/LOLiaAdoXehVrNE5CckyKmD1Rs/DOFKtFtKuFCqFFvoAtba MPefvVy24Ky+1UFXUX/RkR9FN1gDKUCs7OxTChQmCpn1rTc+GG5OLt8ON7k1syGzg+Dc 15/naiBwolmPGMCk7URfd1BqYFEugZLl7gD7xAE5S1Y28GY/2AbYx4Irj2S2kN7S7E+D 7p6J73M3+QNNgx6WNddK3Y8rxLKuDg/h0CaLlCR17ul8u4fxJxvTch7+ZotScEDsQ/Vg 1UxA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUL6sGeNcJ/A4JJ7SBMPftFXQp9ZEEBelSR/xoLi7r9XOqiZ2kh KLO5sb5xEc57QuKj1rWzCFc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqy2pths4TxaoNxjx+VaT2MybVWDUQDC5PH5dz99TaFyRVASX81bpxgJ/jKKzwVfhbV2tI3qNQ== X-Received: by 2002:adf:fcc4:: with SMTP id f4mr12734160wrs.247.1578600909869; Thu, 09 Jan 2020 12:15:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (ip-37-188-146-105.eurotel.cz. [37.188.146.105]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e6sm9541041wru.44.2020.01.09.12.15.08 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 09 Jan 2020 12:15:09 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2020 21:15:08 +0100 From: Michal Hocko To: Andrew Morton Cc: Christopher Lameter , LKML , linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: Re: SLUB: purpose of sysfs events on cache creation/removal Message-ID: <20200109201508.GY4951@dhcp22.suse.cz> References: <20191127174317.GD26807@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20191204132812.GF25242@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20191204153225.GM25242@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20191204173224.GN25242@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20200106115733.GH12699@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20200109145236.GS4951@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20200109114415.cf01bd3ad30c5c4aec981653@linux-foundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200109114415.cf01bd3ad30c5c4aec981653@linux-foundation.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.2 (2019-09-21) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu 09-01-20 11:44:15, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Thu, 9 Jan 2020 15:52:36 +0100 Michal Hocko wrote: > > > On Mon 06-01-20 15:51:26, Cristopher Lameter wrote: > > > On Mon, 6 Jan 2020, Michal Hocko wrote: > > > > > > > On Wed 04-12-19 18:32:24, Michal Hocko wrote: > > > > > [Cc akpm - the email thread starts > > > > > http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191126121901.GE20912@dhcp22.suse.cz] > > > > > > > > ping. > > > > > > There does not seem to be much of an interest in the patch? > > > > It seems it has just fallen through cracks. > > I looked at it - there wasn't really any compelling followup. Btw. I would appreciate if this was explicit because if there is no reaction then it is not clear whether the patch has slipped through cracks or it is not worth pursuing for whatever reason. Thanks! -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs