public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To: "Zengtao (B)" <prime.zeng@hisilicon.com>
Cc: Linuxarm <linuxarm@huawei.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] cpu-topology: Skip the exist but not possible cpu nodes
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2020 10:29:56 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200114102956.GB10403@bogus> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <678F3D1BB717D949B966B68EAEB446ED340E59BA@DGGEMM506-MBX.china.huawei.com>

On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 01:42:25AM +0000, Zengtao (B) wrote:
> Could you help to explain here?
> I understand there are two abnormal cases:
> 1. The cpu node exist in the device tree, but not a possible cpu.
> This case can be caught by of_cpu_node_to_id's return value.

Yes if of_cpu_node_to_id returns -ENODEV, it means there's no logical
CPU associated with this DT node.

> 2. The cpu node does not exist. This case can be caught by above logic. Or
> do you think of_parse_phandle's return value is enough?

Again yes, there's nothing extra needed.

The only change you need is to consider -ENODEV while handling the case(1)

--
Regards,
Sudeep


  reply	other threads:[~2020-01-14 10:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-01-11  6:53 [PATCH v2] cpu-topology: Skip the exist but not possible cpu nodes Zeng Tao
2020-01-13 10:19 ` Sudeep Holla
2020-01-13 12:06   ` Zengtao (B)
2020-01-13 12:21     ` Sudeep Holla
2020-01-14  1:42       ` Zengtao (B)
2020-01-14 10:29         ` Sudeep Holla [this message]
2020-01-14 12:17           ` Zengtao (B)
2020-01-14 14:48             ` Sudeep Holla

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200114102956.GB10403@bogus \
    --to=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
    --cc=prime.zeng@hisilicon.com \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox