From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95487C33CB1 for ; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 12:42:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67BEB222C3 for ; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 12:42:59 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=alien8.de header.i=@alien8.de header.b="OJA9TUse" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729014AbgAOMm6 (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Jan 2020 07:42:58 -0500 Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([5.9.137.197]:46176 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725999AbgAOMm6 (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Jan 2020 07:42:58 -0500 Received: from zn.tnic (p200300EC2F0C7700ACD7CA379FB916C9.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [IPv6:2003:ec:2f0c:7700:acd7:ca37:9fb9:16c9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.skyhub.de (SuperMail on ZX Spectrum 128k) with ESMTPSA id A157F1EC05B5; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 13:42:56 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alien8.de; s=dkim; t=1579092176; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references; bh=y3oho2aNY8UwvRDfCx5mQ3BUUigA9TYFqaFmO03HUTI=; b=OJA9TUseIhqEsTmr0tvqaXy4uA1+8UcXTxVhQwezUI9NJL5hpqB71BAj1flDE8xQmLZXyb tdkWyFVvwEfkxSSpIPHNWwdmUdYN20o9qLjN6bYR3cQ4NyZuqvO1l2OaE+0E16Abc4IhBq Zz0VLvmnJgmTEB4ni1832ddDo1i/leg= Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2020 13:42:52 +0100 From: Borislav Petkov To: Dan Carpenter Cc: Colin Ian King , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H . Peter Anvin" , x86@kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/microcode/amd: fix uninitalized structure cp Message-ID: <20200115124252.GD20975@zn.tnic> References: <20200114111505.320186-1-colin.king@canonical.com> <20200114113834.GE31032@zn.tnic> <20200114120156.GG31032@zn.tnic> <54eca4f8-33ca-24b1-9123-70df3b164043@canonical.com> <20200114121000.GH31032@zn.tnic> <20200114150153.GJ31032@zn.tnic> <20200115042507.GE3719@kadam> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200115042507.GE3719@kadam> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 07:25:07AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > It's probably complaining that cp.name[] isn't initialized. That is possible. > UBSan will probably generate a warning at runtime when we do: > > *ret = cp; > > But otherwise it's harmless. Yes, because we don't do anything with cpio_data.name. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette