public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: kan.liang@linux.intel.com
Cc: mingo@redhat.com, acme@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	eranian@google.com, ak@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH V3] perf/x86: Consider pinned events for group validation
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2020 09:58:41 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200117085841.GW2827@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1579201225-178031-1-git-send-email-kan.liang@linux.intel.com>

On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 11:00:25AM -0800, kan.liang@linux.intel.com wrote:
> From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
> 
> perf stat -M metrics relies on weak groups to reject unschedulable
> groups and run them as non-groups.
> This uses the group validation code in the kernel. Unfortunately
> that code doesn't take pinned events, such as the NMI watchdog, into
> account. So some groups can pass validation, but then later still
> never schedule.
> 
> For example,
> 
>  $echo 1 > /proc/sys/kernel/nmi_watchdog
>  $perf stat -M Page_Walks_Utilization
> 
>  Performance counter stats for 'system wide':
> 
>      <not counted>      itlb_misses.walk_pending
> (0.00%)
>      <not counted>      dtlb_load_misses.walk_pending
> (0.00%)
>      <not counted>      dtlb_store_misses.walk_pending
> (0.00%)
>      <not counted>      ept.walk_pending
> (0.00%)
>      <not counted>      cycles
> (0.00%)
> 
>        1.176613558 seconds time elapsed

More unreadable mess.

  reply	other threads:[~2020-01-17  8:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-01-16 19:00 [RESEND PATCH V3] perf/x86: Consider pinned events for group validation kan.liang
2020-01-17  8:58 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2020-01-17  9:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-01-17 16:22   ` Andi Kleen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200117085841.GW2827@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox