From: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
To: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Cc: ashok.raj@intel.com, jacob.jun.pan@intel.com,
kevin.tian@intel.com, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] iommu/vt-d: Remove unnecessary WARN_ON_ONCE()
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2020 10:59:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200117095953.GB15760@8bytes.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200116015236.4458-1-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 09:52:36AM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
> Address field in device TLB invalidation descriptor is qualified
> by the S field. If S field is zero, a single page at page address
> specified by address [63:12] is requested to be invalidated. If S
> field is set, the least significant bit in the address field with
> value 0b (say bit N) indicates the invalidation address range. The
> spec doesn't require the address [N - 1, 0] to be cleared, hence
> remove the unnecessary WARN_ON_ONCE().
>
> Otherwise, the caller might set "mask = MAX_AGAW_PFN_WIDTH" in order
> to invalidating all the cached mappings on an endpoint, and below
> overflow error will be triggered.
>
> [...]
> UBSAN: Undefined behaviour in drivers/iommu/dmar.c:1354:3
> shift exponent 64 is too large for 64-bit type 'long long unsigned int'
> [...]
>
> Reported-and-tested-by: Frank <fgndev@posteo.de>
> Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Does this need a Fixes and/or stable tag?
Regards,
Joerg
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-01-17 9:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-01-16 1:52 [PATCH 1/1] iommu/vt-d: Remove unnecessary WARN_ON_ONCE() Lu Baolu
2020-01-17 9:59 ` Joerg Roedel [this message]
2020-01-18 2:14 ` Lu Baolu
2020-01-24 14:36 ` Joerg Roedel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200117095953.GB15760@8bytes.org \
--to=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
--cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jacob.jun.pan@intel.com \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox