public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
To: linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] kbuild: use -S instead of -E for precise cc-option test in Kconfig
Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2020 02:14:35 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200117171435.11591-1-masahiroy@kernel.org> (raw)

Currently, -E (stop after the preprocessing stage) is used to check
whether the given compiler flag is supported.

While it is faster than -S (or -c), it can be false-positive. You need
to run the compilation proper to check the flag more precisely.

For example, when testing "--param asan-instrument-allocas=1", my gcc
gives a different result for -E vs -S.

$ gcc -Werror --param asan-instrument-allocas=1 -E -x c /dev/null -o /dev/null
$ echo $?
0

$ gcc -Werror --param asan-instrument-allocas=1 -S -x c /dev/null -o /dev/null
cc1: error: invalid --param name ‘asan-instrument-allocas’; did you mean ‘asan-instrument-writes’?
$ echo $?
1

Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
---

 scripts/Kconfig.include | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/scripts/Kconfig.include b/scripts/Kconfig.include
index d4adfbe42690..bfb44b265a94 100644
--- a/scripts/Kconfig.include
+++ b/scripts/Kconfig.include
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ failure = $(if-success,$(1),n,y)
 
 # $(cc-option,<flag>)
 # Return y if the compiler supports <flag>, n otherwise
-cc-option = $(success,$(CC) -Werror $(CLANG_FLAGS) $(1) -E -x c /dev/null -o /dev/null)
+cc-option = $(success,$(CC) -Werror $(CLANG_FLAGS) $(1) -S -x c /dev/null -o /dev/null)
 
 # $(ld-option,<flag>)
 # Return y if the linker supports <flag>, n otherwise
-- 
2.17.1


             reply	other threads:[~2020-01-17 17:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-01-17 17:14 Masahiro Yamada [this message]
2020-01-21 15:47 ` [PATCH] kbuild: use -S instead of -E for precise cc-option test in Kconfig Masahiro Yamada

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200117171435.11591-1-masahiroy@kernel.org \
    --to=masahiroy@kernel.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox