public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bean Huo <huobean@gmail.com>
To: alim.akhtar@samsung.com, avri.altman@wdc.com,
	asutoshd@codeaurora.org, jejb@linux.ibm.com,
	martin.petersen@oracle.com, stanley.chu@mediatek.com,
	beanhuo@micron.com, bvanassche@acm.org, tomas.winkler@intel.com,
	cang@codeaurora.org
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 1/8] scsi: ufs: Fix ufshcd_probe_hba() reture value in case ufshcd_scsi_add_wlus() fails
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2020 14:08:13 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200120130820.1737-2-huobean@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200120130820.1737-1-huobean@gmail.com>

From: Bean Huo <beanhuo@micron.com>

A non-zero error value likely being returned by ufshcd_scsi_add_wlus()
in case of failure of adding the WLs, but ufshcd_probe_hba() doesn't
use this value, and doesn't report this failure to upper caller.
This patch is to fix this issue.

Fixes: 2a8fa600445c ("ufs: manually add well known logical units")
Reviewed-by: Asutosh Das <asutoshd@codeaurora.org>
Reviewed-by: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@mediatek.com>
Signed-off-by: Bean Huo <beanhuo@micron.com>
---
 drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
index bea036ab189a..9a9085a7bcc5 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
@@ -7032,7 +7032,8 @@ static int ufshcd_probe_hba(struct ufs_hba *hba)
 			ufshcd_init_icc_levels(hba);
 
 		/* Add required well known logical units to scsi mid layer */
-		if (ufshcd_scsi_add_wlus(hba))
+		ret = ufshcd_scsi_add_wlus(hba);
+		if (ret)
 			goto out;
 
 		/* Initialize devfreq after UFS device is detected */
-- 
2.17.1


  reply	other threads:[~2020-01-20 13:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-01-20 13:08 [PATCH v4 0/8] Use UFS device indicated maximum LU number Bean Huo
2020-01-20 13:08 ` Bean Huo [this message]
2020-01-20 13:08 ` [PATCH v4 2/8] scsi: ufs: Delete struct ufs_dev_desc Bean Huo
2020-01-20 13:08 ` [PATCH v4 3/8] scsi: ufs: Split ufshcd_probe_hba() based on its called flow Bean Huo
2020-01-20 20:35   ` Asutosh Das (asd)
2020-01-20 13:08 ` [PATCH v4 4/8] scsi: ufs: Move ufshcd_get_max_pwr_mode() to ufshcd_device_params_init() Bean Huo
2020-01-20 20:39   ` Asutosh Das (asd)
2020-01-20 13:08 ` [PATCH v4 5/8] scsi: ufs: Inline two functions into their callers Bean Huo
2020-01-20 20:41   ` Asutosh Das (asd)
2020-01-22  5:08   ` Bart Van Assche
2020-01-20 13:08 ` [PATCH v4 6/8] scsi: ufs: Delete is_init_prefetch from struct ufs_hba Bean Huo
2020-01-20 20:43   ` Asutosh Das (asd)
2020-01-22  5:13   ` Bart Van Assche
2020-01-22 10:13     ` [EXT] " Bean Huo (beanhuo)
2020-01-20 13:08 ` [PATCH v4 7/8] scsi: ufs: Add max_lu_supported in struct ufs_dev_info Bean Huo
2020-01-20 13:08 ` [PATCH v4 8/8] scsi: ufs: Use UFS device indicated maximum LU number Bean Huo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200120130820.1737-2-huobean@gmail.com \
    --to=huobean@gmail.com \
    --cc=alim.akhtar@samsung.com \
    --cc=asutoshd@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=avri.altman@wdc.com \
    --cc=beanhuo@micron.com \
    --cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=cang@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=stanley.chu@mediatek.com \
    --cc=tomas.winkler@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox