From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A61B0C33CAA for ; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 16:55:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C49921D7E for ; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 16:55:54 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=shutemov-name.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.i=@shutemov-name.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.b="coBTIYDt" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729100AbgATQzx (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Jan 2020 11:55:53 -0500 Received: from mail-lj1-f195.google.com ([209.85.208.195]:45269 "EHLO mail-lj1-f195.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726876AbgATQzx (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Jan 2020 11:55:53 -0500 Received: by mail-lj1-f195.google.com with SMTP id j26so34494506ljc.12 for ; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 08:55:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=shutemov-name.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=4VxE8v5dH+QpdIZbYSbZopov06646USn27k3epy+Wdg=; b=coBTIYDt1doh8KwTjQ/LrQPzlHL/KqyHV+iOe8tFqs2rkm3AdXRv0oYpAL4/w6j0UD JskKUR3tiw2dUXjOLKEVj93VQKqlG9q59G+vAq5bQ0xgIcKXA6IKmQDzGBbXssGxwVf0 OfSh7b9NPR47TSBOL5h0cWvl6yjgD6nh5mnAsmvadQLomfsqFTmhrNiTCVojNx6mePx2 y3yIWwUWU9aKrgkA9/gARzvUhl0exvfwqgg2cmRbGYdCvcoq5EXALjWKYKp324r0P+TF BI1fkvJL08rSTHsvnRsDTvbK2ckjmRC3xYWKmjFqV6pYVWsmSpDz3euXeIp8MXnS4Bw3 AbxA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=4VxE8v5dH+QpdIZbYSbZopov06646USn27k3epy+Wdg=; b=nO+Qmkktb1oy82aKszk5hdyIJ6H8lxn5EUfCn2qroPgKl2bUBrB8+ksFio64HjISsG D0seYMZSlWrgRilLHKE9G0adhirZ7ZSpCeEqPyrlsaE08y8WhTEwpiz9OfcOshFvrVfb m58xc6ZYPJbM8046L0yGK2ujhRfhABCCtz/vmIkRCFOs0FBDWTq5YOP9x1wgbqqhpzq8 6tTan6utDYo+BvOgWmAN15FVqppTkwvarf6h/Y5e7OPeIsdvzS+mEz6vZw67FEoYEGeL hTak30bQboEI5FtUjwg+cccUnDwoz30RMKjNEyJI0CxGR3uaWmGYyoO+nlRI5T6gAy7Q FQTA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWSoZ1OgM293uxcZQ16GuQmG6nPDFQzTj08aXWythAQMFJGiuTX /26q0j9wwH5QNSvpEfADyuxfUw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqz8+d8e8/ZKTOPzWyN5EtzNhFN+4Vbr9CW0QzOcMtDjDg3K7YXAP35itBVxIkjfThj9Hh9lwQ== X-Received: by 2002:a2e:7e05:: with SMTP id z5mr13061141ljc.99.1579539351341; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 08:55:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from box.localdomain ([86.57.175.117]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r12sm16971664ljh.105.2020.01.20.08.55.50 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 20 Jan 2020 08:55:50 -0800 (PST) Received: by box.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id AFEAA10028A; Mon, 20 Jan 2020 19:55:51 +0300 (+03) Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2020 19:55:51 +0300 From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" To: SeongJae Park Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, SeongJae Park , acme@kernel.org, brendan.d.gregg@gmail.com, corbet@lwn.net, mgorman@suse.de, dwmw@amazon.com, amit@kernel.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, sj38.park@gmail.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] Introduce Data Access MONitor (DAMON) Message-ID: <20200120165551.codmosqc2pkcunpa@box> References: <20200120162757.32375-1-sjpark@amazon.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200120162757.32375-1-sjpark@amazon.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jan 20, 2020 at 05:27:49PM +0100, SeongJae Park wrote: > This patchset introduces a new kernel module for practical monitoring of > data accesses, namely DAMON. Looks like it's not integrated with perf at all right? Why? Correlating measurements from different domains would help to see the bigger picture. -- Kirill A. Shutemov