From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: "T.Kohada" <Kohada.Tetsuhiro@dc.mitsubishielectric.co.jp>
Cc: Mori.Takahiro@ab.mitsubishielectric.co.jp,
motai.hirotaka@aj.mitsubishielectric.co.jp,
Valdis Kletnieks <valdis.kletnieks@vt.edu>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: exfat: remove fs_func struct.
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2020 09:57:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200122085737.GA2511011@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200117062046.20491-1-Kohada.Tetsuhiro@dc.MitsubishiElectric.co.jp>
On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 03:20:46PM +0900, T.Kohada wrote:
> Remove 'fs_func struct' and change indirect calls to direct calls.
>
> The following issues are described in exfat's TODO.
> > Create helper function for exfat_set_entry_time () and
> > exfat_set_entry_type () because it's sort of ugly to be calling the same functionn directly and other code calling through the fs_func struc ponters ...
>
> The fs_func struct was used for switching the helper functions of fat16/fat32/exfat.
> Now, it has lost the role of switching, just making the code less readable.
>
> Signed-off-by: T.Kohada <Kohada.Tetsuhiro@dc.MitsubishiElectric.co.jp>
We need a "full" name here, not just an abbreviation, use what you would
for a document.
Also the patch does not apply to the linux-next tree at all, so I can't
take it. Please rebase and resend.
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-01-22 8:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-01-17 6:20 [PATCH] staging: exfat: remove fs_func struct T.Kohada
2020-01-22 8:57 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2020-01-23 6:38 ` Kohada.Tetsuhiro
2020-01-23 6:52 ` Dan Carpenter
2020-01-23 7:04 ` me
2020-01-23 7:25 ` Dan Carpenter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200122085737.GA2511011@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=Kohada.Tetsuhiro@dc.mitsubishielectric.co.jp \
--cc=Mori.Takahiro@ab.mitsubishielectric.co.jp \
--cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=motai.hirotaka@aj.mitsubishielectric.co.jp \
--cc=valdis.kletnieks@vt.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox