From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79128C33CAF for ; Thu, 23 Jan 2020 08:23:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45EA924125 for ; Thu, 23 Jan 2020 08:23:28 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=alien8.de header.i=@alien8.de header.b="kL3OvILS" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727235AbgAWIX1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Jan 2020 03:23:27 -0500 Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([5.9.137.197]:45466 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726232AbgAWIX0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Jan 2020 03:23:26 -0500 Received: from zn.tnic (p200300EC2F095B0060FE665DEF90E16F.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [IPv6:2003:ec:2f09:5b00:60fe:665d:ef90:e16f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.skyhub.de (SuperMail on ZX Spectrum 128k) with ESMTPSA id 5D8831EC047D; Thu, 23 Jan 2020 09:23:25 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alien8.de; s=dkim; t=1579767805; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references; bh=WIJL5XHyKt5KPKlO9I4JS71YWtGovioHHFMiIIQUA4M=; b=kL3OvILS/zc0IEoZqMt3xfaJMrGvbZ3Bsz+Z35zr15SqFdwyAaZZXkpnGmaT1ZJUZsBH28 r3RnAaE+xZT/6FCp3SdHdZeV7RrhAfodbplmpbM9vPNjJximr9OYLjvpaEreAKrE5Gi6CT NEZrzDbQh+F9o9/Jp5EWDNwvUWAlwJc= Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2020 09:23:22 +0100 From: Borislav Petkov To: Shiping Ji Cc: James Morse , Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, LKML , linux-edac , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Sasha Levin , hangl@microsoft.com, Lei Wang , ruizhao@microsoft.com, shji@microsoft.com, Scott Branden , Yuqing Shen Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 1/2] dt-bindings: edac: dmc-520.yaml Message-ID: <20200123082322.GB10328@zn.tnic> References: <09a2fe69-842f-01cf-1cfa-d5fc639b158a@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <09a2fe69-842f-01cf-1cfa-d5fc639b158a@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 04:31:07PM -0800, Shiping Ji wrote: > This is the device tree bindings for new EDAC driver dmc520_edac.c. > > From: Lei Wang > > Signed-off-by: Lei Wang > Signed-off-by: Shiping Ji > Reviewed-by: James Morse > > --- > Changes in v10: > - Convert to the YAML format for binding description So you've changed this patch considerably. If you do so, you cannot keep Reviewed-by tags. Also, AFAICT, you've written a completely *new* patch which would mean that this time you're the author. Correct? If so, you don't need to keep Lei's From. In any case, please take some time to read this: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/index.html It is a lot so do concentrate on the whole process, i.e., this: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/development-process.html so that you have a basic idea. If you have questions, I'm sure Sasha would be willing to answer them even if he's away now. Thx. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette