From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A758C32771 for ; Fri, 24 Jan 2020 18:02:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32C4D214AF for ; Fri, 24 Jan 2020 18:02:04 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b="Zlwl7Z+1" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2391111AbgAXSCD (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Jan 2020 13:02:03 -0500 Received: from mail-pl1-f193.google.com ([209.85.214.193]:38225 "EHLO mail-pl1-f193.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2390815AbgAXSCD (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Jan 2020 13:02:03 -0500 Received: by mail-pl1-f193.google.com with SMTP id t6so1106318plj.5 for ; Fri, 24 Jan 2020 10:02:02 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=G5fEZ2U0+CDS0hG812zeGyRQK6DtCt/mFqHvclq9uxI=; b=Zlwl7Z+1c2DrxDJdXvTPzh7C0sA9dUNpKWhqDlfwFbHqka9y984PM3S5s3ev0wosoc PQ8FlrOzjsxrL8BtP75O/HDz4gBnX4lSw2p3h0IBOxR7SIMbih5TDY0/HuTx3vH2ssJk eBcePQIzQNCu358CeCSHEs0rLSHQa5zJc3yOwPTIFN3lpzuZw9BVBalrOrRGjdj7uJtr NqbK+wD5RG6DYmdbkmaWnDarITmrhdLgEPPn1x85FLPuzsV6b+MoxvTbEQyvxNa6Q7Vj /0CYcxglHG6XJrXuHosf/q1Cghr2kT1EvIar+xrMhuFbfb29sbUnQf8/spqMFtoTyhvF p8Hg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=G5fEZ2U0+CDS0hG812zeGyRQK6DtCt/mFqHvclq9uxI=; b=n32XknVmO/0p3RVvoVgEgnMu8Q6AFvS9mLs9fiuERsBtSkh04IIDWjrXJ6zAzkoALT H5R7rBNkI6TcwDsrGxrPDyvHlyL5tdVc17AvduxguTXvFzvNvqEDcGjsshS140cHFENp xODJ1O3cqZ/atlGEM2zjmoVlqR0gWeJry3w+v2kffb7BdYZKJ2KEUa6fxRBsFuS0fqYq Pb2CT3JHfUg8vICNzb8aUkBv5LEne52O25PLu1ORs/hddHdDBGLt8J2z/3bt6Vr7hf7c qfy2e8RXBIpSKTZhWUW4JbDUK6cbtOKZAkEDl6k0arsOoX5+H+Z8gv2bOdFvBwP0WeV6 9Gsw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAU4S2WIGLgrrdQBiVZkwPfQKZBs4PCb71IG4xJsiMrMT3ksotVy WegQN0xU2XDd88bxLTVSB+lW/A== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwBEJkZ8Vl8tLg9tesk9zn7tQ3YoyossHKjnx3jILJeNULNqlWCDh10GhwkawsZ99tjJSIQMw== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:b788:: with SMTP id e8mr4897986pls.1.1579888922548; Fri, 24 Jan 2020 10:02:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from ripper (104-188-17-28.lightspeed.sndgca.sbcglobal.net. [104.188.17.28]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z6sm6617298pfa.155.2020.01.24.10.02.01 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 24 Jan 2020 10:02:01 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2020 10:01:27 -0800 From: Bjorn Andersson To: Stephen Boyd Cc: agross@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, jshriram@codeaurora.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, mturquette@baylibre.com, psodagud@codeaurora.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, tdas@codeaurora.org, tsoni@codeaurora.org, vinod.koul@linaro.org, vnkgutta@codeaurora.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] clk: qcom: rpmh: Add support for RPMH clocks on SM8250 Message-ID: <20200124180127.GO1908628@ripper> References: <1579217994-22219-1-git-send-email-vnkgutta@codeaurora.org> <1579217994-22219-3-git-send-email-vnkgutta@codeaurora.org> <20200123064614.78346217F4@mail.kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200123064614.78346217F4@mail.kernel.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed 22 Jan 22:46 PST 2020, Stephen Boyd wrote: > Quoting Venkata Narendra Kumar Gutta (2020-01-16 15:39:49) > > @@ -490,6 +512,7 @@ static int clk_rpmh_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > > { .compatible = "qcom,sdm845-rpmh-clk", .data = &clk_rpmh_sdm845}, > > { .compatible = "qcom,sm8150-rpmh-clk", .data = &clk_rpmh_sm8150}, > > { .compatible = "qcom,sc7180-rpmh-clk", .data = &clk_rpmh_sc7180}, > > + { .compatible = "qcom,sm8250-rpmh-clk", .data = &clk_rpmh_sm8250}, > > We should sort this on compatible. > Yes we should, in case this was a request I sent out a patch for this: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20200124175934.3937473-1-bjorn.andersson@linaro.org/ Regards, Bjorn > > { } > > }; > > MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, clk_rpmh_match_table);