From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C15F4C35254 for ; Wed, 5 Feb 2020 14:26:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95F8520702 for ; Wed, 5 Feb 2020 14:26:32 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="aefzUb08" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728129AbgBEO0b (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Feb 2020 09:26:31 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-1.mimecast.com ([207.211.31.81]:24470 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726597AbgBEO0b (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Feb 2020 09:26:31 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1580912789; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=KAdV3hA+UnlwePFUiQQxF7Qhd3fY3tGdtbme44OOFs8=; b=aefzUb08POcOzVG5gdwD+F/OQGLSy5mOd0MRlJFbJHSSoS5jMPjzRKmDWCiedF/PKqnf5X t0siZE5GZAMmCiILyg4JeMAMCpFEYWNdTV91rPuka6yGevtmd2wABcNfTSTzyJLP5kx+xP +zbgPLqBVtRlHWLz8ni/rfVhvOSFeoM= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-371-OBZq-5t8Nwu9IXhE-e1YOQ-1; Wed, 05 Feb 2020 09:26:26 -0500 X-MC-Unique: OBZq-5t8Nwu9IXhE-e1YOQ-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx06.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 209311081FA3; Wed, 5 Feb 2020 14:26:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (ovpn-12-97.pek2.redhat.com [10.72.12.97]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 56DD25C1B5; Wed, 5 Feb 2020 14:26:20 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2020 22:26:18 +0800 From: Baoquan He To: David Hildenbrand Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, Andrew Morton , Oscar Salvador , Michal Hocko , Pavel Tatashin , Dan Williams , Wei Yang Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 08/10] mm/memory_hotplug: Don't check for "all holes" in shrink_zone_span() Message-ID: <20200205142618.GE8965@MiWiFi-R3L-srv> References: <20191006085646.5768-1-david@redhat.com> <20191006085646.5768-9-david@redhat.com> <20200204142516.GD26758@MiWiFi-R3L-srv> <20200205124329.GE26758@MiWiFi-R3L-srv> <20200205133442.GC8965@MiWiFi-R3L-srv> <2868343a-745b-e2b6-7e78-d5649c00ee31@redhat.com> <20200205141254.GD8965@MiWiFi-R3L-srv> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.16 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 02/05/20 at 03:16pm, David Hildenbrand wrote: > >>>> Anyhow, that patch is already upstream and I don't consider this high > >>>> priority. Thanks :) > >>> > >>> Yeah, noticed you told Wei the status in another patch thread, I am fine > >>> with it, just leave it to you to decide. Thanks. > >> > >> I am fairly busy right now. Can you send a patch (double-checking and > >> making this eventually unconditional?). Thanks! > > > > Understood, sorry about the noise, David. I will think about this. > > > > No need to excuse, really, I'm very happy about review feedback! > Glad to hear it, thanks. > The review of this series happened fairly late. Bad, because it's not > perfect, but good, because no serious stuff was found (so far :) ). If > you also don't have time to look into this, I can put it onto my todo > list, just let me know. Both is OK to me, as long as thing is clear to us. I will discuss with Wei Yang for now. You can post patch anytime if you make one.