From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0987C352A2 for ; Wed, 5 Feb 2020 19:30:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F89A2072B for ; Wed, 5 Feb 2020 19:30:11 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1580931011; bh=zgPH6CjpaYslcV2Tgmz8XCYoT8H8KXeXhfqTCRmR35Y=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=bnsVO9IVuiZCuKEtCc04PuIYD9iaQB576ossHtk8VQwG+velS2OinOWo3DfPYDCTO ljrJ5ri++HeiOmKkTS7A32cnaP9TrA6+JrxeZUASv62ybrwTNPeKJguZI96xNTRyGQ 2oTSWG2KyCFu3sUY+zo/muGvF1gADkf8xBB3vqxw= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727471AbgBETaL (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Feb 2020 14:30:11 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:41476 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727079AbgBETaK (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Feb 2020 14:30:10 -0500 Received: from localhost (unknown [193.117.204.200]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8102D20720; Wed, 5 Feb 2020 19:30:09 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1580931009; bh=zgPH6CjpaYslcV2Tgmz8XCYoT8H8KXeXhfqTCRmR35Y=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=Y19TpT2XVQJnKdKeOYhnjg9KeAjacEjGqb1NfX2xkdxBudz9GCMyGBGfnDUR+LqVt 1gvWmDIcTInFWN9MkJh2yclA+sX57Uz1aE7qljzRAqZA22E8j5i1P2luXI7hqxT8G/ BIqtRhrwuc4IWr0bq5biJT2wVUzC6ScAqiEJ9EQY= Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2020 19:30:08 +0000 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Guenter Roeck Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org, ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.4 00/90] 5.4.18-stable review Message-ID: <20200205193008.GC1327971@kroah.com> References: <20200203161917.612554987@linuxfoundation.org> <9a5a92f2-6e28-a9ab-a851-8d7e56482df6@roeck-us.net> <20200205151357.GB1236691@kroah.com> <20200205162429.GB25403@roeck-us.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200205162429.GB25403@roeck-us.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Feb 05, 2020 at 08:24:29AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On Wed, Feb 05, 2020 at 03:13:57PM +0000, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 04, 2020 at 06:37:38AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > > On 2/3/20 8:19 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.18 release. > > > > There are 90 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > > > let me know. > > > > > > > > Responses should be made by Wed, 05 Feb 2020 16:17:59 +0000. > > > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > > > > > > > > Building i386:allyesconfig ... failed > > > Building i386:allmodconfig ... failed > > > -------------- > > > Error log: > > > In file included from arch/x86/kernel/pci-dma.c:2: > > > include/linux/dma-direct.h:29:20: error: conflicting types for 'dma_capable' > > > 29 | static inline bool dma_capable(struct device *dev, dma_addr_t addr, size_t size, > > > | ^~~~~~~~~~~ > > > In file included from include/linux/dma-direct.h:12, > > > from arch/x86/kernel/pci-dma.c:2: > > > arch/x86/include/asm/dma-direct.h:5:6: note: previous declaration of 'dma_capable' was here > > > 5 | bool dma_capable(struct device *dev, dma_addr_t addr, size_t size); > > > > Ok, I think this is now resolved with a patch that Sasha added. > > > > I have pushed out a -rc4 that _should_ build and boot properly. > > > The i386 build still fails with v5.4.17-99-gbd0c6624a110 (-rc4). Crap. Ok, let me get some food and then try to figure this out... greg k-h