[PATCH 5.5 096/367] ACPI / battery: Deal with design or full capacity being reported as -1

Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-02-10T13:05:48Z

From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>

commit cc99f0ad52467028cb1251160f23ad4bb65baf20 upstream.

Commit b41901a2cf06 ("ACPI / battery: Do not export energy_full[_design]
on devices without full_charge_capacity") added support for some (broken)
devices which always report 0 for both design- and full_charge-capacity.

This assumes that if the capacity is not being reported it is 0. The
ThunderSoft TS178 tablet's _BIX implementation falsifies this assumption.
It reports ACPI_BATTERY_VALUE_UNKNOWN (-1) as full_charge_capacity, which
we treat as a valid value which causes several problems.

This commit fixes this by adding a new ACPI_BATTERY_CAPACITY_VALID() helper
which checks that the value is not 0 and not -1; and using this whenever we
need to test if either design_capacity or full_charge_capacity is valid.

Fixes: b41901a2cf06 ("ACPI / battery: Do not export energy_full[_design] on devices without full_charge_capacity")
Cc: 4.19+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.19+
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

---
drivers/acpi/battery.c | 19 ++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/acpi/battery.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/battery.c
@@ -38,6 +38,8 @@
#define PREFIX "ACPI: "

#define ACPI_BATTERY_VALUE_UNKNOWN 0xFFFFFFFF
+#define ACPI_BATTERY_CAPACITY_VALID(capacity) \
+ ((capacity) != 0 && (capacity) != ACPI_BATTERY_VALUE_UNKNOWN)

#define ACPI_BATTERY_DEVICE_NAME "Battery"

@@ -192,7 +194,8 @@ static int acpi_battery_is_charged(struc

static bool acpi_battery_is_degraded(struct acpi_battery *battery)
{
- return battery->full_charge_capacity && battery->design_capacity &&
+ return ACPI_BATTERY_CAPACITY_VALID(battery->full_charge_capacity) &&
+ ACPI_BATTERY_CAPACITY_VALID(battery->design_capacity) &&
battery->full_charge_capacity < battery->design_capacity;
}

@@ -263,14 +266,14 @@ static int acpi_battery_get_property(str
break;
case POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_CHARGE_FULL_DESIGN:
case POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_ENERGY_FULL_DESIGN:
- if (battery->design_capacity == ACPI_BATTERY_VALUE_UNKNOWN)
+ if (!ACPI_BATTERY_CAPACITY_VALID(battery->design_capacity))
ret = -ENODEV;
else
val->intval = battery->design_capacity * 1000;
break;
case POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_CHARGE_FULL:
case POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_ENERGY_FULL:
- if (battery->full_charge_capacity == ACPI_BATTERY_VALUE_UNKNOWN)
+ if (!ACPI_BATTERY_CAPACITY_VALID(battery->full_charge_capacity))
ret = -ENODEV;
else
val->intval = battery->full_charge_capacity * 1000;
@@ -283,11 +286,12 @@ static int acpi_battery_get_property(str
val->intval = battery->capacity_now * 1000;
break;
case POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_CAPACITY:
- if (battery->capacity_now && battery->full_charge_capacity)
+ if (battery->capacity_now == ACPI_BATTERY_VALUE_UNKNOWN ||
+ !ACPI_BATTERY_CAPACITY_VALID(battery->full_charge_capacity))
+ ret = -ENODEV;
+ else
val->intval = battery->capacity_now * 100/
battery->full_charge_capacity;
- else
- val->intval = 0;
break;
case POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_CAPACITY_LEVEL:
if (battery->state & ACPI_BATTERY_STATE_CRITICAL)
@@ -799,7 +803,8 @@ static int sysfs_add_battery(struct acpi
battery->bat_desc.properties = charge_battery_props;
battery->bat_desc.num_properties =
ARRAY_SIZE(charge_battery_props);
- } else if (battery->full_charge_capacity == 0) {
+ } else if (!ACPI_BATTERY_CAPACITY_VALID(
+ battery->full_charge_capacity)) {
battery->bat_desc.properties =
energy_battery_full_cap_broken_props;
battery->bat_desc.num_properties =