From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC1D8C352A4 for ; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 21:36:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F7C32467B for ; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 21:36:26 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1581543386; bh=6o999Zb3VZgSvcpIeTmP9Oijyoof6aUSifX0bm4tLz8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=b1FDUB4XdLBxqCAJLx4ZhJ1CZIoPCCCvTRSrPzK8JiQ0C7i/lZ4aQn4PmI/QsyI6z uVv77JEeh9tLFOdY0owaTGhTmkJTv13M3MYZ1JftunJvhy8AqMtuqd3PJsdTajR54d /1itAvQ+KT9eCawlUCNIJ0Wsj2EGLkmHguBpy1UA= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729203AbgBLVg0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Feb 2020 16:36:26 -0500 Received: from mail-qt1-f196.google.com ([209.85.160.196]:42369 "EHLO mail-qt1-f196.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727564AbgBLVgZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Feb 2020 16:36:25 -0500 Received: by mail-qt1-f196.google.com with SMTP id r5so2794008qtt.9; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 13:36:25 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=iBeSTprJEgkhPZLCbVo2vH4gD47fVWZXk0D/63E7q/E=; b=u2vGyuPYOVf8Rmx/bD+nZrJPyKgzpcQAucV+E89I+0VbBjaC7JDsg0R4oL58eiXRBR 5NFyvjgdJp2dQzi72IL804HQKAbZY2dthM9WC+S8A70Re9ACGey4VMBJdtdOLZLFUma2 EHTF+mgfQBIBphP0j9VAHOXSIpM8g6mtelcIVcE5ysde1cdsZ9vn7L1QBhaWSTAUB3UM 5WD48B7NO6e/gZ00uVbN97wTwk1BzLNutcmJ41frW4YrMMFr1h8ZRIffu1BrPIF1BZSM sM7jpW836/Ff8sufIQfRsa9fH1sgH3jX2PXLUZJc4Xl2CnPCL+VELD0vNx3yHzyRQBtv y3AQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=iBeSTprJEgkhPZLCbVo2vH4gD47fVWZXk0D/63E7q/E=; b=F8HseHIcytCAKLhPS2NES2t8UW5+1wTsB1oyhrhLkFtnlBmxfUhIhWOW2Rcifuxq3R vMPqzKjsSCrNBJwGI6GPn12bNdb1vJkbwpOU5V27AiNhBj1/iVtQ+XIXyKkOkFy55q96 6e2qWBvZf3moln6QheqnoEyPNDiSzcQM2JKAHtvAZ6njziBh4t8q866VJm/cEoncb+GQ iuWU40F8ybNeBJCZEQdyMFD/zUHfWyyqkzaQjy3Rrec2Ty61ndJA+LHKGjPQluz3Gza/ 7BnQku6eI+db5nnewwLGGB0OCzcu3roaJO209QeBEP4Q3kehO6LhrHppvuzAi6a9OUL+ 1/sg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXQ/TkzuC8AfM/4+yS28JUvrdj1Qtp7wZ+WFwkf3YmvWKdA5bSr RYdMC8awVb1rvUQqQdNG/M5NZQ2BWZk= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzodA0qG8UxndOqY4Z1I/K+EhgpqDqoAniaUWCZTFZowWYGO3/UrC+gYBomkZtVR/zixMosVQ== X-Received: by 2002:ac8:65d4:: with SMTP id t20mr21522456qto.6.1581543384701; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 13:36:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([2620:10d:c091:500::1:985a]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z21sm81006qka.122.2020.02.12.13.36.24 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 12 Feb 2020 13:36:24 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2020 16:36:23 -0500 From: Tejun Heo To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Prateek Sood , cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpuset: Make cpuset hotplug synchronous Message-ID: <20200212213623.GF80993@mtj.thefacebook.com> References: <1579878449-10164-1-git-send-email-prsood@codeaurora.org> <20200212211832.GC80993@mtj.thefacebook.com> <20200212213248.GE14897@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200212213248.GE14897@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hey, Peter. On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 10:32:48PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > I think I have a similar patch in one of the many in-progress series I > keep around; IIRC it is the one where I add per-cpu support to > SCHED_DEADLINE. The hotplug accounting becomes easier if we do this. > > Sadly this series is fairly low on the todo list atm though :/ I have no > problems keeping it around until such a time though. I see. I don't have anything against the change except that there doesn't seem to be a good reason right now. If it's something which can be useful for planned changes, might as well apply it and let it cook upstream. Will apply to for-5.7. Thanks. -- tejun