From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0CC5C2BA83 for ; Thu, 13 Feb 2020 12:02:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C05852168B for ; Thu, 13 Feb 2020 12:02:18 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="OdHLNwR4" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729964AbgBMMCS (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Feb 2020 07:02:18 -0500 Received: from mail-pj1-f67.google.com ([209.85.216.67]:37300 "EHLO mail-pj1-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727059AbgBMMCR (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Feb 2020 07:02:17 -0500 Received: by mail-pj1-f67.google.com with SMTP id m13so2342341pjb.2 for ; Thu, 13 Feb 2020 04:02:17 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=RRXMjUNw+xleND16yc9+iBGDSDnAovrhaKwTKWLvH4I=; b=OdHLNwR411oe2vSXB1qG3m0im5YFGhl4JzmYcPiV42wya/We0CecqYAW7NJYKzrQEf cEm54DZEJ7CAyStJT/+OXURPcmmO+khiVuz0nRfJkk/G9rGFZOKxLNkGZ9w26bmTwL7m P4VzPfvmxBJY7u6i7kRfsQU9I7HoiVC08PEr6B1BCbLLmRrIfySlYhjzxy+YpyroDhZN zRKXldy68/Au+jJoW6j5YeTugxJvOPYNKLwnEldc+8F4gq6hyMqvCAw0q3oaw5YzonxS LygOvDyb3Vs4Kqh/A21lonAAm0zZNugoNwUyO0kFwjCUZIvayHAnLmEwmWANZeYpKGLm xabw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=RRXMjUNw+xleND16yc9+iBGDSDnAovrhaKwTKWLvH4I=; b=tfe7Z033fcrXVQX5dkzQSRYK1JqbPN/7z3SgQnKDUmo4vMGjd9RxCo8doYUfn0HpJb eaXFAWnEUr7WsJdjIJnK/F7IvE6vPqiBQp6AXX54KkC2AZJLLJKTn5C8+JztWAuIsRwS gRFrCT/fqVkAQgdvkbfU8f0uCytg4jqW362Ku61jmSHWCasd/6H+fyrj4Ff/6Egz083L GvU3bfviL8x3UBhlLRxfrqN5I4rah9Jl17v87VfuMIYw8MITpeXUUYFvJqOpsc2bQ7h6 Wqdj2XMDSD3x19DLXW/47/L/BAmUbhO37s3woiaoL3wOadiGSYKQnxhcwQ1f8z+59e0O h/mg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWAtsgqN/pyBPWoRzZjc1VBxVoewEY7vm4eRNxXr5IpfOhMtaSx GPPiDdfLeEwdavvxrp1YmL4= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqx25fBCeoQmJT3ALdvBFc9+HSoTj4ZG4KZ2G1+KI8gABA/wtnot1/1oCw2OKmzF+m7QH9+/2w== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:9a85:: with SMTP id w5mr13884178plp.323.1581595337260; Thu, 13 Feb 2020 04:02:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([2401:fa00:8f:203:5bbb:c872:f2b1:f53b]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q187sm2909317pfq.185.2020.02.13.04.02.15 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 13 Feb 2020 04:02:16 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2020 21:02:14 +0900 From: Sergey Senozhatsky To: John Ogness Cc: Petr Mladek , Sergey Senozhatsky , Andy Shevchenko , Sergey Senozhatsky , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Steven Rostedt Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] printk: Declare log_wait as external variable Message-ID: <20200213120214.GD36551@google.com> References: <20200203131528.52825-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> <20200211124317.x5erhl7kvxj2nq6a@pathway.suse.cz> <20200212013133.GB13208@google.com> <20200212140355.56drih2wfcryjjtl@pathway.suse.cz> <8736bfdgsz.fsf@linutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8736bfdgsz.fsf@linutronix.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On (20/02/12 15:24), John Ogness wrote: > On 2020-02-12, Petr Mladek wrote: [..] > >> I can take a look at dev_ksmg.c/proc_kmsg.c option, unless > >> someone else wants to spend their time on this. > > > > It would be lovely from my POV. I am only concerned about > > the lockless printk() stuff. I would prefer to avoid creating > > too many conflicts in the same merge window. Well, I am > > not sure how many conflicts there would be. Adding John > > into CC. > > I would also love to see these changes. But can we _please_ focus on the > lockless printk ringbuffer merge first? Agreed. > The patches already exist and are (hopefully) being reviewed. ^^^ are (hopefully) being tested. -ss