Re: [RESEND v5 2/2] pwm: core: Convert period and duty cycle to u64

[Guru Das Srinagesh <gurus@codeaurora.org>]

Hi Uwe,

On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 09:28:04PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 11:39:26AM -0800, Guru Das Srinagesh wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 11:18:02AM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > > 
> > > On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 10:54:08AM -0800, Guru Das Srinagesh wrote:
> > > > @@ -305,8 +305,8 @@ struct pwm_chip {
> > > >   * @duty_cycle: duty cycle of the PWM signal (in nanoseconds)
> > > >   */
> > > >  struct pwm_capture {
> > > > -	unsigned int period;
> > > > -	unsigned int duty_cycle;
> > > > +	u64 period;
> > > > +	u64 duty_cycle;
> > > >  };
> > > 
> > > Is this last hunk a separate change?
> > > 
> > > Otherwise looks fine.
> > 
> > No, this is very much a part of the change and not a separate one.
> 
> Not sure we understand each other. I wondered if conversion of the
> pwm_capture stuff should be done separately. (OTOH I wonder if this is
> used at all and already considered deleting it.)

I see. Could you please elaborate on your concerns? I think this hunk's
being in this patch makes sense as duty and period should be converted
to u64 throughout the file in one go.

Also, it looks like pwm_capture is being used by pwm-sti.c and
pwm-stm32.c currently.

Thank you.

Guru Das.