public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
To: Jin Yao <yao.jin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: acme@kernel.org, jolsa@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
	mingo@redhat.com, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com,
	Linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ak@linux.intel.com,
	kan.liang@intel.com, yao.jin@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] perf stat: Show percore counts in per CPU output
Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2020 23:54:07 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200216225407.GB157041@krava> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200214080452.26402-1-yao.jin@linux.intel.com>

On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 04:04:52PM +0800, Jin Yao wrote:

SNIP

>  CPU1               1,009,312      cpu/event=cpu-cycles,percore/
>  CPU2               2,784,072      cpu/event=cpu-cycles,percore/
>  CPU3               2,427,922      cpu/event=cpu-cycles,percore/
>  CPU4               2,752,148      cpu/event=cpu-cycles,percore/
>  CPU6               2,784,072      cpu/event=cpu-cycles,percore/
>  CPU7               2,427,922      cpu/event=cpu-cycles,percore/
> 
>         1.001416041 seconds time elapsed
> 
>  v4:
>  ---
>  Ravi Bangoria reports an issue in v3. Once we offline a CPU,
>  the output is not correct. The issue is we should use the cpu
>  idx in print_percore_thread rather than using the cpu value.

Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>

btw, there's slight misalignment in -I output, but not due
to your change, it's there for some time now, and probably
in other agregation  outputs as well:


  $ sudo ./perf stat -e cpu/event=cpu-cycles/ -a -A  -I 1000
  #           time CPU                    counts unit events
       1.000224464 CPU0               7,251,151      cpu/event=cpu-cycles/                                       
       1.000224464 CPU1              21,614,946      cpu/event=cpu-cycles/                                       
       1.000224464 CPU2              30,812,097      cpu/event=cpu-cycles/                                       

should be (extra space after CPUX):

       1.000224464 CPU2               30,812,097      cpu/event=cpu-cycles/                                       

I'll put it on my TODO, but if you're welcome to check on it ;-)

thanks,
jirka


  reply	other threads:[~2020-02-16 22:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-02-14  8:04 [PATCH v4] perf stat: Show percore counts in per CPU output Jin Yao
2020-02-16 22:54 ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
2020-02-17  1:22   ` Jin, Yao
2020-02-17 11:06     ` Jiri Olsa
2020-02-18  1:02       ` Jin, Yao
2020-02-18  6:14         ` Jiri Olsa
2020-02-17 14:45   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2020-03-19 14:10 ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Jin Yao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200216225407.GB157041@krava \
    --to=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=Linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kan.liang@intel.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=yao.jin@intel.com \
    --cc=yao.jin@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox