From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
To: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, rostedt@goodmis.org,
bsegall@google.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
pauld@redhat.com, parth@linux.ibm.com, hdanton@sina.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] sched/numa: Replace runnable_load_avg by load_avg
Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2020 15:38:01 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200218153801.GF3420@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b67ae78b-17ba-8f3f-9052-fecefb848e3d@arm.com>
On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 02:54:14PM +0000, Valentin Schneider wrote:
> On 2/14/20 3:27 PM, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> > @@ -1473,38 +1473,35 @@ bool should_numa_migrate_memory(struct task_struct *p, struct page * page,
> > group_faults_cpu(ng, src_nid) * group_faults(p, dst_nid) * 4;
> > }
> >
> > -static inline unsigned long cfs_rq_runnable_load_avg(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq);
> > -
> > -static unsigned long cpu_runnable_load(struct rq *rq)
> > -{
> > - return cfs_rq_runnable_load_avg(&rq->cfs);
> > -}
> > +/*
> > + * 'numa_type' describes the node at the moment of load balancing.
> > + */
> > +enum numa_type {
> > + /* The node has spare capacity that can be used to run more tasks. */
> > + node_has_spare = 0,
> > + /*
> > + * The node is fully used and the tasks don't compete for more CPU
> > + * cycles. Nevertheless, some tasks might wait before running.
> > + */
> > + node_fully_busy,
> > + /*
> > + * The node is overloaded and can't provide expected CPU cycles to all
> > + * tasks.
> > + */
> > + node_overloaded
> > +};
>
> Could we reuse group_type instead? The definitions are the same modulo
> s/group/node/.
>
I kept the naming because there is the remote possibility that NUMA
balancing will deviate in some fashion. Right now, it's harmless.
> >
> > /* Cached statistics for all CPUs within a node */
> > struct numa_stats {
> > unsigned long load;
> > -
> > + unsigned long util;
> > /* Total compute capacity of CPUs on a node */
> > unsigned long compute_capacity;
> > + unsigned int nr_running;
> > + unsigned int weight;
> > + enum numa_type node_type;
> > };
> >
> > -/*
> > - * XXX borrowed from update_sg_lb_stats
> > - */
> > -static void update_numa_stats(struct numa_stats *ns, int nid)
> > -{
> > - int cpu;
> > -
> > - memset(ns, 0, sizeof(*ns));
> > - for_each_cpu(cpu, cpumask_of_node(nid)) {
> > - struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
> > -
> > - ns->load += cpu_runnable_load(rq);
> > - ns->compute_capacity += capacity_of(cpu);
> > - }
> > -
> > -}
> > -
> > struct task_numa_env {
> > struct task_struct *p;
> >
> > @@ -1521,6 +1518,47 @@ struct task_numa_env {
> > int best_cpu;
> > };
> >
> > +static unsigned long cpu_load(struct rq *rq);
> > +static unsigned long cpu_util(int cpu);
> > +
> > +static inline enum
> > +numa_type numa_classify(unsigned int imbalance_pct,
> > + struct numa_stats *ns)
> > +{
> > + if ((ns->nr_running > ns->weight) &&
> > + ((ns->compute_capacity * 100) < (ns->util * imbalance_pct)))
> > + return node_overloaded;
> > +
> > + if ((ns->nr_running < ns->weight) ||
> > + ((ns->compute_capacity * 100) > (ns->util * imbalance_pct)))
> > + return node_has_spare;
> > +
> > + return node_fully_busy;
> > +}
> > +
>
> As Mel pointed out, this is group_is_overloaded() and group_has_capacity().
> @Mel, you mentioned having a common helper, do you have that laying around?
> I haven't seen it in your reconciliation series.
>
I didn't merge that part of the first version of my series. I was
waiting to see how the implementation for allowing a small degree of
imbalance looks like. If it's entirely confined in adjust_numa_balance
then I'll create the common helper at the same time. For now, I left the
possibility open that numa_classify would use something different than
group_is_overloaded or group_has_capacity even if I find that hard to
imagine at the moment.
> What I'm naively thinking here is that we could have either move the whole
> thing to just sg_lb_stats (AFAICT the fields of numa_stats are a subset of it),
> or if we really care about the stack we could tweak the ordering to ensure
> we can cast one into the other (not too enticed by that one though).
>
Yikes, no I'd rather not do that. Basically all I did before was create
a common helper like __lb_has_capacity that only took basic types as
parameters. group_has_capacity and numa_has_capacity were simple wrappers
that read the correct fields from their respective stats structures.
--
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-18 15:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-14 15:27 [PATCH v2 0/5] remove runnable_load_avg and improve group_classify Vincent Guittot
2020-02-14 15:27 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] sched/fair: Reorder enqueue/dequeue_task_fair path Vincent Guittot
2020-02-18 12:37 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2020-02-18 13:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-02-18 14:15 ` Vincent Guittot
2020-02-19 11:07 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2020-02-19 16:26 ` Vincent Guittot
2020-02-20 13:38 ` Dietmar Eggemann
[not found] ` <20200222152541.GA11669@geo.homenetwork>
2020-02-26 16:30 ` Vincent Guittot
2020-02-14 15:27 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] sched/numa: Replace runnable_load_avg by load_avg Vincent Guittot
2020-02-18 12:37 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2020-02-18 13:50 ` Mel Gorman
2020-02-18 14:17 ` Vincent Guittot
2020-02-18 14:42 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2020-02-18 14:54 ` Valentin Schneider
2020-02-18 15:33 ` Vincent Guittot
2020-02-18 15:38 ` Mel Gorman [this message]
2020-02-18 16:50 ` Valentin Schneider
2020-02-18 17:41 ` Mel Gorman
2020-02-18 17:54 ` Valentin Schneider
2020-02-18 16:51 ` Vincent Guittot
2020-02-14 15:27 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] sched/pelt: Remove unused runnable load average Vincent Guittot
2020-02-21 9:57 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2020-02-21 11:56 ` Vincent Guittot
2020-02-14 15:27 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] sched/pelt: Add a new runnable average signal Vincent Guittot
2020-02-18 14:54 ` Valentin Schneider
2020-02-18 15:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-02-18 15:28 ` Vincent Guittot
2020-02-18 16:30 ` Valentin Schneider
2020-02-18 21:19 ` Valentin Schneider
2020-02-19 9:02 ` Vincent Guittot
2020-02-19 9:08 ` Mel Gorman
2020-02-19 12:55 ` [PATCH v3 " Vincent Guittot
2020-02-19 14:02 ` Mel Gorman
2020-02-19 20:10 ` Valentin Schneider
2020-02-20 14:36 ` Vincent Guittot
2020-02-20 16:11 ` Valentin Schneider
2020-02-21 8:56 ` Vincent Guittot
2020-02-24 15:57 ` Valentin Schneider
2020-02-21 9:04 ` Mel Gorman
2020-02-21 9:25 ` Vincent Guittot
2020-02-21 10:40 ` Mel Gorman
2020-02-21 13:28 ` Vincent Guittot
2020-02-20 15:04 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2020-02-21 9:44 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2020-02-21 11:47 ` Vincent Guittot
2020-02-14 15:27 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] sched/fair: Take into account runnable_avg to classify group Vincent Guittot
2020-02-15 21:58 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] remove runnable_load_avg and improve group_classify Mel Gorman
2020-02-21 9:58 ` Dietmar Eggemann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200218153801.GF3420@suse.de \
--to=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=hdanton@sina.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=parth@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pauld@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).