Re: [PATCH 5.4 000/344] 5.4.22-stable review

Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-02-23T17:26:13Z

On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 01:57:20PM +0200, Tero Kristo wrote:
> On 21/02/2020 13:17, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> > On Fri, 21 Feb 2020 at 15:34, Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On 21/02/2020 07:36, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.22 release.
> > > > There are 344 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > > let me know.
> > > >
> > > > Responses should be made by Sun, 23 Feb 2020 07:19:49 +0000.
> > > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > > >
> > > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > > > https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.22-rc1.gz
> > > > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y
> > > > and the diffstat can be found below.
> > > >
> > > > thanks,
> > > >
> > > > greg k-h
> > > >
> > > > -------------
> > > > Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:
> > >
> > > ...
> > >
> > > > Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>
> > > > ARM: OMAP2+: pdata-quirks: add PRM data for reset support
> > >
> > >
> > > The above commit is generating the following build error on ARM systems ...
> > >
> > > dvs/git/dirty/git-master_l4t-upstream/kernel/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pdata-quirks.c:27:10: fatal error: linux/platform_data/ti-prm.h: No such file or directory
> > > #include <linux/platform_data/ti-prm.h>
> > > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >
> > build error:
> >
> > ../arch/arm/mach-omap2/pdata-quirks.c:27:10: fatal error:
> > linux/platform_data/ti-prm.h: No such file or directory
> > 27 | #include <linux/platform_data/ti-prm.h>
> > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > compilation terminated.
> > make[2]: *** [../scripts/Makefile.build:265:
> > arch/arm/mach-omap2/pdata-quirks.o] Error 1
> >
> > With these below three patches, it applies cleanly and builds.
> > But I'm not sure these are not expected to get into stable rc 5.4 branch.
>
> Yeah, without PRM driver the pdata-quirk patch should not have been picked
> up. I wonder why it ended up in stable. Tony, any ideas?

I've dropped the offending patch now, sorry about that.

greg k-h