From: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
To: linmiaohe <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com, rkrcmar@redhat.com, vkuznets@redhat.com,
wanpengli@tencent.com, jmattson@google.com, joro@8bytes.org,
tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de,
hpa@zytor.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: X86: eliminate some meaningless code
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2020 07:23:58 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200221152358.GC12665@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1582293926-23388-1-git-send-email-linmiaohe@huawei.com>
On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 10:05:26PM +0800, linmiaohe wrote:
> From: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
>
> When kvm_vcpu_ioctl_get_cpuid2() fails, we set cpuid->nent to the value of
> vcpu->arch.cpuid_nent. But this is in vain as cpuid->nent is not copied to
> userspace by copy_to_user() from call site. Get rid of this meaningless
> assignment and further cleanup the var r and out jump label.
Ha, took me a while to see that.
> On the other hand, when kvm_vcpu_ioctl_get_cpuid2() succeeds, we do not
> change the content of struct cpuid. We can avoid copy_to_user() from call
> site as struct cpuid remain unchanged.
>
> Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c | 14 ++++----------
> arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 6 ------
> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
> index b1c469446b07..b83cedc63328 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
> @@ -265,20 +265,14 @@ int kvm_vcpu_ioctl_get_cpuid2(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> struct kvm_cpuid2 *cpuid,
> struct kvm_cpuid_entry2 __user *entries)
> {
> - int r;
> -
> - r = -E2BIG;
> if (cpuid->nent < vcpu->arch.cpuid_nent)
> - goto out;
> - r = -EFAULT;
> + return -E2BIG;
> +
> if (copy_to_user(entries, &vcpu->arch.cpuid_entries,
> vcpu->arch.cpuid_nent * sizeof(struct kvm_cpuid_entry2)))
> - goto out;
> - return 0;
Hmm, so this ioctl() is straight up broken. cpuid->nent should be updated
on success so that userspace knows how many entries were retrieved, i.e.
the code should look something like below, with kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl()
unchanged.
I'm guessing no VMM actually uses this ioctl(), e.g. neither Qemu or CrosVM
use it, which is why the broken behavior has gone unnoticed. Don't suppose
you'd want to write a selftest to hammer KVM_{SET,GET}_CPUID2?
int kvm_vcpu_ioctl_get_cpuid2(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
struct kvm_cpuid2 *cpuid,
struct kvm_cpuid_entry2 __user *entries)
{
if (cpuid->nent < vcpu->arch.cpuid_nent)
return -E2BIG;
if (copy_to_user(entries, &vcpu->arch.cpuid_entries,
vcpu->arch.cpuid_nent * sizeof(struct kvm_cpuid_entry2)))
return -EFAULT;
cpuid->nent = vcpu->arch.cpuid_nent;
return 0;
}
> + return -EFAULT;
>
> -out:
> - cpuid->nent = vcpu->arch.cpuid_nent;
> - return r;
> + return 0;
> }
>
> static __always_inline void cpuid_mask(u32 *word, int wordnum)
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> index fbabb2f06273..683c54e7be36 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> @@ -4295,12 +4295,6 @@ long kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl(struct file *filp,
> goto out;
> r = kvm_vcpu_ioctl_get_cpuid2(vcpu, &cpuid,
> cpuid_arg->entries);
> - if (r)
> - goto out;
> - r = -EFAULT;
> - if (copy_to_user(cpuid_arg, &cpuid, sizeof(cpuid)))
> - goto out;
> - r = 0;
> break;
> }
> case KVM_GET_MSRS: {
> --
> 2.19.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-21 15:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-21 14:05 [PATCH] KVM: X86: eliminate some meaningless code linmiaohe
2020-02-21 15:23 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2020-02-21 16:31 ` Paolo Bonzini
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-02-24 1:44 linmiaohe
2020-02-24 1:54 linmiaohe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200221152358.GC12665@linux.intel.com \
--to=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linmiaohe@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox