From: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
To: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/10] KVM: VMX: Fold vpid_sync_vcpu_{single,global}() into vpid_sync_context()
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2020 07:32:44 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200221153244.GD12665@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87zhdcrrdk.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com>
On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 02:39:51PM +0100, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com> writes:
>
> > Fold vpid_sync_vcpu_global() and vpid_sync_vcpu_single() into their sole
> > caller. KVM should always prefer the single variant, i.e. the only
> > reason to use the global variant is if the CPU doesn't support
> > invalidating a single VPID, which is the entire purpose of wrapping the
> > calls with vpid_sync_context().
> >
> > No functional change intended.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
> > ---
> > arch/x86/kvm/vmx/ops.h | 16 ++--------------
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/ops.h b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/ops.h
> > index 612df1bdb26b..eb6adc77a55d 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/ops.h
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/ops.h
> > @@ -253,29 +253,17 @@ static inline void __invept(unsigned long ext, u64 eptp, gpa_t gpa)
> > vmx_asm2(invept, "r"(ext), "m"(operand), ext, eptp, gpa);
> > }
> >
> > -static inline void vpid_sync_vcpu_single(int vpid)
> > +static inline void vpid_sync_context(int vpid)
> > {
> > if (vpid == 0)
> > return;
> >
> > if (cpu_has_vmx_invvpid_single())
> > __invvpid(VMX_VPID_EXTENT_SINGLE_CONTEXT, vpid, 0);
> > -}
> > -
> > -static inline void vpid_sync_vcpu_global(void)
> > -{
> > - if (cpu_has_vmx_invvpid_global())
> > + else
> > __invvpid(VMX_VPID_EXTENT_ALL_CONTEXT, 0, 0);
> > }
> >
> > -static inline void vpid_sync_context(int vpid)
> > -{
> > - if (cpu_has_vmx_invvpid_single())
> > - vpid_sync_vcpu_single(vpid);
> > - else
> > - vpid_sync_vcpu_global();
> > -}
> > -
> > static inline void vpid_sync_vcpu_addr(int vpid, gva_t addr)
> > {
> > if (vpid == 0)
>
> In the original code it's only vpid_sync_vcpu_single() which has 'vpid
> == 0' check, vpid_sync_vcpu_global() doesn't have it. So in the
> hypothetical situation when cpu_has_vmx_invvpid_single() is false AND
> we've e.g. exhausted our VPID space and allocate_vpid() returned zero,
> the new code just won't do anything while the old one would've done
> __invvpid(VMX_VPID_EXTENT_ALL_CONTEXT, 0, 0), right?
Ah rats. I lost track of that functional change between making the commit
and writing the changelog.
I'll spin a v2 to rewrite the changelog, and maybe add the "vpid == 0"
check in a separate patch.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-21 15:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-20 20:43 [PATCH 00/10] KVM: x86: Clean up VMX's TLB flushing code Sean Christopherson
2020-02-20 20:43 ` [PATCH 01/10] KVM: VMX: Use vpid_sync_context() directly when possible Sean Christopherson
2020-02-21 13:17 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2020-02-21 15:36 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-02-21 17:26 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-02-20 20:43 ` [PATCH 02/10] KVM: VMX: Move vpid_sync_vcpu_addr() down a few lines Sean Christopherson
2020-02-21 13:19 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2020-02-20 20:43 ` [PATCH 03/10] KVM: VMX: Handle INVVPID fallback logic in vpid_sync_vcpu_addr() Sean Christopherson
2020-02-21 13:26 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2020-02-20 20:43 ` [PATCH 04/10] KVM: VMX: Fold vpid_sync_vcpu_{single,global}() into vpid_sync_context() Sean Christopherson
2020-02-21 13:39 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2020-02-21 15:32 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2020-02-21 17:28 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-02-20 20:43 ` [PATCH 05/10] KVM: nVMX: Use vpid_sync_vcpu_addr() to emulate INVVPID with address Sean Christopherson
2020-02-21 13:43 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2020-02-20 20:43 ` [PATCH 06/10] KVM: x86: Move "flush guest's TLB" logic to separate kvm_x86_ops hook Sean Christopherson
[not found] ` <87tv3krqta.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com>
2020-02-21 17:31 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-02-21 17:32 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-02-20 20:43 ` [PATCH 07/10] KVM: VMX: Clean up vmx_flush_tlb_gva() Sean Christopherson
2020-02-21 13:54 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2020-02-20 20:43 ` [PATCH 08/10] KVM: x86: Drop @invalidate_gpa param from kvm_x86_ops' tlb_flush() Sean Christopherson
2020-02-21 13:56 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2020-02-20 20:43 ` [PATCH 09/10] KVM: VMX: Drop @invalidate_gpa from __vmx_flush_tlb() Sean Christopherson
2020-02-20 20:43 ` [PATCH 10/10] KVM: VMX: Fold __vmx_flush_tlb() into vmx_flush_tlb() Sean Christopherson
2020-02-21 13:20 ` [PATCH 00/10] KVM: x86: Clean up VMX's TLB flushing code Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200221153244.GD12665@linux.intel.com \
--to=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox