Re: [RFC PATCH v4 00/19] Core scheduling v4

Dario Faggioli
2019-11-12T01:45:22Z

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1195 bytes --]

On Fri, 2019-11-01 at 10:03 -0400, Vineeth Remanan Pillai wrote:
> Hi Phil,
>
> > Unless I'm mistaken 7 of the first 8 of these went into sched/core
> > and are now in linux (from v5.4-rc1). It may make sense to rebase
> > on
> > that and simplify the series.
> >
> Thanks a lot for pointing this out. We shall test on a rebased 5.4 RC
> and post the changes soon, if the tests goes well. For v3, while
> rebasing
> to an RC kernel, we saw perf regressions and hence did not check the
> RC kernel this time. You are absolutely right that we can simplify
> the
> patch series with 5.4 RC.
>
And, in case it's useful to anybody, here's a rebase of this series on
top of 5.4-rc7:

https://github.com/dfaggioli/linux/tree/wip/sched/v5.4-rc7-coresched

This also includes Tim's patch (this one
<5e3cea14-28d1-bf1e-cabe-fb5b48fdeadc@linux.intel.com>) and is, for
now, *only* compile tested.

Regards
--
Dario Faggioli, Ph.D
http://about.me/dario.faggioli
Virtualization Software Engineer
SUSE Labs, SUSE https://www.suse.com/
-------------------------------------------------------------------
<<This happens because _I_ choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]