From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD5B4C11D32 for ; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 17:00:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A5572084E for ; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 17:00:28 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1582563628; bh=W7+NdE/sBOj4Ciqjv7fao4Un5OJFKOe6I3yj4AfiFkA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=1YMYwK2XbZhTDoOTn7IW+WQUjZX9JCzi5C9uMbdjGabzWd+RRJqzYN8ilmOj9ZN2e O73qP3kzMOjfImclz451YxhwUlwKBrt6KcDRD6FH+PhhbNXOsn33Gv25HTynqS8Ks0 nvEkIdCdNx++kgeic4g2yYVMn+Uc8b+BdnkvANck= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727837AbgBXRA1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Feb 2020 12:00:27 -0500 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:39960 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727108AbgBXRA1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Feb 2020 12:00:27 -0500 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAA8A1FB; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 09:00:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (unknown [10.37.6.21]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2E8433F703; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 09:00:26 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2020 17:00:24 +0000 From: Mark Brown To: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli Cc: Andreas Kemnade , hns@goldelico.com, j.neuschaefer@gmx.net, contact@paulk.fr, josua.mayer@jm0.eu, lgirdwood@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] regulator: core: fix handling negative voltages e.g. in EPD PMICs Message-ID: <20200224170024.GK6215@sirena.org.uk> References: <20200223153502.15306-1-andreas@kemnade.info> <20200224162131.2a4f9b01@primarylaptop.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="M9kwpIYUMbI/2cCx" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200224162131.2a4f9b01@primarylaptop.localdomain> X-Cookie: How you look depends on where you go. User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --M9kwpIYUMbI/2cCx Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 04:21:31PM +0100, Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli wrote: > Andreas Kemnade wrote: > > No idea about the "Amazon Kindle Fire (first generation)" > > which also has a partial devicetree in mainline. > I think that the first generation Kindle Fire (omap4-kc1.dts) are > regular tablet and have a regular display (no e-ink). Right, all Kindle Fire devices have regular displays. --M9kwpIYUMbI/2cCx Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAl5UAScACgkQJNaLcl1U h9BhHggAhiZGz+eNFZStZ9O0Qnpt/aA7SqICKdTqmMPsB4L8dbfbPzDcu4zobgNx pVUjdbTpUR0tsQQrNc+i/ozy947hTdNEJI21zDnDrpNFC6lLUz6H69AWnjlEiJt0 052c5hU+q6it5PaoztU/VlA7N6M6Tuj2PjlO9Y6hwmhVZuHitMI2j4g2stz03Rzt +vZowNFcs9JSg6hLaRwr/9bcKMfD0oNmhODt0gQbYnbSZ7pIrSctwWMwFLoHbHm4 mhDv0DIfV48gALTBtI67I9z9+AoG2JlB6wce+U14asllME4PZkJtaDnfeFMFAeHC T5wMlnskg2myKf/xeb+yQkY8LHgbYQ== =Z7Tn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --M9kwpIYUMbI/2cCx--