From: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
To: Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@intel.com>
Cc: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] kvm: vmx: Use basic exit reason to check if it's the specific VM EXIT
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2020 22:13:17 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200225061317.GV29865@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50134028-ef7a-46c6-7602-095c47406ed7@intel.com>
On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 08:13:15AM +0800, Xiaoyao Li wrote:
> On 2/25/2020 12:17 AM, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> >On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 02:04:46PM +0100, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> >>Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@intel.com> writes:
> >>
> >>>On 2/24/2020 6:16 PM, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> >>>>Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@intel.com> writes:
> >>>>
> >>>Here variable basic_exit_reason is added for the cases where only basic
> >>>exit reason number is needed.
> >>>
> >>
> >>Can we do the other way around, i.e. introduce 'extended_exit_reason'
> >>and use it where all 32 bits are needed? I'm fine with the change, just
> >>trying to minimize the (unneeded) code churn.
> >
> >100% agree. Even better than adding a second field to vcpu_vmx would be
> >to make it a union, though we'd probably want to call it something like
> >full_exit_reason in that case. That should give us compile-time checks on
> >exit_reason, e.g. if we try to query one of the upper bits using a u16, e.g.
>
> I have thought about union, but it seems
>
> union {
> u16 exit_reason;
> u32 full_exit_reason;
> }
>
> is not a good name. Since there are many codes in vmx.c and nested.c assume
> that exit_reason stands for 32-bit EXIT REASON vmcs field as well as
> evmcs->vm_exit_reason and vmcs12->vm_exit_reason. Do we really want to also
> rename them to full_exit_reason?
It's actually the opposite, almost all of the VMX code assumes exit_reason
holds only the basic exit reason, i.e. a 16-bit value. For example, SGX
adds a modifier flag to denote a VM-Exit was from enclave mode, and that
bit needs to be stripped from exit_reason, otherwise all the checks like
"if (exit_reason == blah_blah_blah)" fail.
Making exit_reason a 16-bit alias of the full/extended exit_reason neatly
sidesteps that issue. And it is an issue that has caused actual problems
in the past, e.g. see commit beb8d93b3e42 ("KVM: VMX: Fix handling of #MC
that occurs during VM-Entry"). Coincidentally, that commit also removes a
local "u16 basic_exit_reason" :-).
Except for one mistake, the pseudo-patch below is the entirety of required
changes. Most (all?) of the functions that take "u32 exit_reason" can (and
should) continue to take a u32.
As for the name, I strongly prefer keeping the exit_reason name for the
basic exit reason. The vast majority of VM-Exits do not have modifiers
set, i.e. "basic exit reason" == vmcs.EXIT_REASON for nearly all normal
usage. This holds true in every form of communication, e.g. when discussing
VM-Exit reasons, it's never qualified with "basic", it's simply the exit
reason. IMO the code is better off following the colloquial usage of "exit
reason". A simple comment above the union would suffice to clear up any
confusion with respect to the SDM.
> Maybe we name it
>
> union {
> u16 basic_exit_reason;
> u32 exit_reason;
> }
>
> as what SDM defines?
>
> >--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> >+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> >@@ -5818,7 +5818,7 @@ static int vmx_handle_exit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> > if (is_guest_mode(vcpu) && nested_vmx_exit_reflected(vcpu, exit_reason))
> > return nested_vmx_reflect_vmexit(vcpu, exit_reason);
> >
> >- if (exit_reason & VMX_EXIT_REASONS_FAILED_VMENTRY) {
> >+ if (vmx->full_exit_reason & VMX_EXIT_REASONS_FAILED_VMENTRY) {
If we do go the union route, this snippet of code is insufficient, the
full/extended exit reason needs to be snapshotted early for use in the
tracepoint and in fail_entry.hardware_entry_failure_reason.
> > dump_vmcs();
> > vcpu->run->exit_reason = KVM_EXIT_FAIL_ENTRY;
> > vcpu->run->fail_entry.hardware_entry_failure_reason
> >@@ -6620,11 +6620,12 @@ static void vmx_vcpu_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> > vmx->nested.nested_run_pending = 0;
> > vmx->idt_vectoring_info = 0;
> >
> >- vmx->exit_reason = vmx->fail ? 0xdead : vmcs_read32(VM_EXIT_REASON);
> >- if ((u16)vmx->exit_reason == EXIT_REASON_MCE_DURING_VMENTRY)
> >+ vmx->full_exit_reason = vmx->fail ? 0xdead : vmcs_read32(VM_EXIT_REASON);
> >+ if (vmx->exit_reason == EXIT_REASON_MCE_DURING_VMENTRY)
> > kvm_machine_check();
> >
> >- if (vmx->fail || (vmx->exit_reason & VMX_EXIT_REASONS_FAILED_VMENTRY))
> >+ if (vmx->fail ||
> >+ (vmx->full_exit_reason & VMX_EXIT_REASONS_FAILED_VMENTRY))
> > return;
> >
> > vmx->loaded_vmcs->launched = 1;
> >diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h
> >index 7f42cf3dcd70..60c09640ea59 100644
> >--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h
> >+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h
> >@@ -260,7 +260,10 @@ struct vcpu_vmx {
> > int vpid;
> > bool emulation_required;
> >
> >- u32 exit_reason;
> >+ union {
> >+ u16 exit_reason;
> >+ u32 full_exit_reason;
> >+ }
> >
> > /* Posted interrupt descriptor */
> > struct pi_desc pi_desc;
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >>--
> >>Vitaly
> >>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-25 6:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-24 2:07 [PATCH 0/2] KVM: VMX: Use basic exit reason for cheking and indexing Xiaoyao Li
2020-02-24 2:07 ` [PATCH 1/2] kvm: vmx: Use basic exit reason to check if it's the specific VM EXIT Xiaoyao Li
2020-02-24 10:16 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2020-02-24 12:01 ` Xiaoyao Li
2020-02-24 13:04 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2020-02-24 16:17 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-02-25 0:13 ` Xiaoyao Li
2020-02-25 6:13 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2020-02-25 6:41 ` Xiaoyao Li
2020-02-26 23:59 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-02-27 8:35 ` Xiaoyao Li
2020-02-27 23:57 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-02-25 0:27 ` Krish Sadhukhan
2020-02-25 13:11 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2020-02-25 18:28 ` Krish Sadhukhan
2020-02-24 2:07 ` [PATCH 2/2] kvm: nvmx: Use basic(exit_reason) when checking specific EXIT_REASON Xiaoyao Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200225061317.GV29865@linux.intel.com \
--to=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
--cc=xiaoyao.li@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).