The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/vtime: Prevent unstable evaluation of WARN(vtime->state)
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2020 14:34:08 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200227133407.GA21795@lenoir> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200123180849.28486-1-frederic@kernel.org>

Ping (again)?


On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 07:08:49PM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> From: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> 
> As the vtime is sampled under loose seqcount protection by kcpustat, the
> vtime fields may change as the code flows. Where logic dictates a field
> has a static value, use a READ_ONCE.
> 
> Fixes: 74722bb223d0 ("sched/vtime: Bring up complete kcpustat accessor")
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
> ---
>  kernel/sched/cputime.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
>  1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/cputime.c b/kernel/sched/cputime.c
> index d43318a489f2..df3577149d2e 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/cputime.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/cputime.c
> @@ -912,8 +912,10 @@ void task_cputime(struct task_struct *t, u64 *utime, u64 *stime)
>  	} while (read_seqcount_retry(&vtime->seqcount, seq));
>  }
>  
> -static int vtime_state_check(struct vtime *vtime, int cpu)
> +static int vtime_state_fetch(struct vtime *vtime, int cpu)
>  {
> +	int state = READ_ONCE(vtime->state);
> +
>  	/*
>  	 * We raced against a context switch, fetch the
>  	 * kcpustat task again.
> @@ -930,10 +932,10 @@ static int vtime_state_check(struct vtime *vtime, int cpu)
>  	 *
>  	 * Case 1) is ok but 2) is not. So wait for a safe VTIME state.
>  	 */
> -	if (vtime->state == VTIME_INACTIVE)
> +	if (state == VTIME_INACTIVE)
>  		return -EAGAIN;
>  
> -	return 0;
> +	return state;
>  }
>  
>  static u64 kcpustat_user_vtime(struct vtime *vtime)
> @@ -952,14 +954,15 @@ static int kcpustat_field_vtime(u64 *cpustat,
>  {
>  	struct vtime *vtime = &tsk->vtime;
>  	unsigned int seq;
> -	int err;
>  
>  	do {
> +		int state;
> +
>  		seq = read_seqcount_begin(&vtime->seqcount);
>  
> -		err = vtime_state_check(vtime, cpu);
> -		if (err < 0)
> -			return err;
> +		state = vtime_state_fetch(vtime, cpu);
> +		if (state < 0)
> +			return state;
>  
>  		*val = cpustat[usage];
>  
> @@ -972,7 +975,7 @@ static int kcpustat_field_vtime(u64 *cpustat,
>  		 */
>  		switch (usage) {
>  		case CPUTIME_SYSTEM:
> -			if (vtime->state == VTIME_SYS)
> +			if (state == VTIME_SYS)
>  				*val += vtime->stime + vtime_delta(vtime);
>  			break;
>  		case CPUTIME_USER:
> @@ -984,11 +987,11 @@ static int kcpustat_field_vtime(u64 *cpustat,
>  				*val += kcpustat_user_vtime(vtime);
>  			break;
>  		case CPUTIME_GUEST:
> -			if (vtime->state == VTIME_GUEST && task_nice(tsk) <= 0)
> +			if (state == VTIME_GUEST && task_nice(tsk) <= 0)
>  				*val += vtime->gtime + vtime_delta(vtime);
>  			break;
>  		case CPUTIME_GUEST_NICE:
> -			if (vtime->state == VTIME_GUEST && task_nice(tsk) > 0)
> +			if (state == VTIME_GUEST && task_nice(tsk) > 0)
>  				*val += vtime->gtime + vtime_delta(vtime);
>  			break;
>  		default:
> @@ -1039,23 +1042,23 @@ static int kcpustat_cpu_fetch_vtime(struct kernel_cpustat *dst,
>  {
>  	struct vtime *vtime = &tsk->vtime;
>  	unsigned int seq;
> -	int err;
>  
>  	do {
>  		u64 *cpustat;
>  		u64 delta;
> +		int state;
>  
>  		seq = read_seqcount_begin(&vtime->seqcount);
>  
> -		err = vtime_state_check(vtime, cpu);
> -		if (err < 0)
> -			return err;
> +		state = vtime_state_fetch(vtime, cpu);
> +		if (state < 0)
> +			return state;
>  
>  		*dst = *src;
>  		cpustat = dst->cpustat;
>  
>  		/* Task is sleeping, dead or idle, nothing to add */
> -		if (vtime->state < VTIME_SYS)
> +		if (state < VTIME_SYS)
>  			continue;
>  
>  		delta = vtime_delta(vtime);
> @@ -1064,15 +1067,15 @@ static int kcpustat_cpu_fetch_vtime(struct kernel_cpustat *dst,
>  		 * Task runs either in user (including guest) or kernel space,
>  		 * add pending nohz time to the right place.
>  		 */
> -		if (vtime->state == VTIME_SYS) {
> +		if (state == VTIME_SYS) {
>  			cpustat[CPUTIME_SYSTEM] += vtime->stime + delta;
> -		} else if (vtime->state == VTIME_USER) {
> +		} else if (state == VTIME_USER) {
>  			if (task_nice(tsk) > 0)
>  				cpustat[CPUTIME_NICE] += vtime->utime + delta;
>  			else
>  				cpustat[CPUTIME_USER] += vtime->utime + delta;
>  		} else {
> -			WARN_ON_ONCE(vtime->state != VTIME_GUEST);
> +			WARN_ON_ONCE(state != VTIME_GUEST);
>  			if (task_nice(tsk) > 0) {
>  				cpustat[CPUTIME_GUEST_NICE] += vtime->gtime + delta;
>  				cpustat[CPUTIME_NICE] += vtime->gtime + delta;
> @@ -1083,7 +1086,7 @@ static int kcpustat_cpu_fetch_vtime(struct kernel_cpustat *dst,
>  		}
>  	} while (read_seqcount_retry(&vtime->seqcount, seq));
>  
> -	return err;
> +	return 0;
>  }
>  
>  void kcpustat_cpu_fetch(struct kernel_cpustat *dst, int cpu)
> -- 
> 2.25.0
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-02-27 13:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-01-23 18:08 [PATCH] sched/vtime: Prevent unstable evaluation of WARN(vtime->state) Frederic Weisbecker
2020-02-14 16:23 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2020-02-27 13:34 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2020-03-06 14:42 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Chris Wilson
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2019-12-30  1:08 [PATCH 2/6] sched/vtime: Bring up complete kcpustat accessor Frederic Weisbecker
2019-12-30  9:04 ` [PATCH] sched/vtime: Prevent unstable evaluation of WARN(vtime->state) Chris Wilson
2019-12-30 17:39   ` Frederic Weisbecker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200227133407.GA21795@lenoir \
    --to=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox