From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBD65C3F2D2 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 2020 16:24:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF789246A8 for ; Fri, 28 Feb 2020 16:24:01 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=alien8.de header.i=@alien8.de header.b="Fz2efFjS" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726151AbgB1QYA (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Feb 2020 11:24:00 -0500 Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([5.9.137.197]:34050 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725805AbgB1QYA (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Feb 2020 11:24:00 -0500 Received: from zn.tnic (p200300EC2F084600F4D7BC1685508240.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [IPv6:2003:ec:2f08:4600:f4d7:bc16:8550:8240]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.skyhub.de (SuperMail on ZX Spectrum 128k) with ESMTPSA id 10A0F1EC0CF6; Fri, 28 Feb 2020 17:23:59 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alien8.de; s=dkim; t=1582907039; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references; bh=cdbBnTgYTQoXKrYT3pTGtwBJB6vH0ncPdNFJY+NQKms=; b=Fz2efFjSnnzpY0qvIANeKMAog/lwwfY8wsaH8gtChXojbks69plYzmLa0f8/G0enazIUSH m18K0Dja0v4E34ZKMG60rhNYWzEEcIRM9lFQbEasv4YyP8x6lNYcO6GnAstONRNSJuuWl6 QqNqC74kGXYAvDmxHg6PvE0D3+GVSkE= Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2020 17:23:59 +0100 From: Borislav Petkov To: Yu-cheng Yu Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Dave Hansen , Tony Luck , Andy Lutomirski , Rik van Riel , "Ravi V. Shankar" , Sebastian Andrzej Siewior , Fenghua Yu , Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 8/8] x86/fpu/xstate: Restore supervisor xstates for __fpu__restore_sig() Message-ID: <20200228162359.GC25261@zn.tnic> References: <20200121201843.12047-1-yu-cheng.yu@intel.com> <20200121201843.12047-9-yu-cheng.yu@intel.com> <20200221175859.GL25747@zn.tnic> <77f3841a92df5d0c819699ee3612118d566b7445.camel@intel.com> <20200228121724.GA25261@zn.tnic> <89bcab262d6dad4c08c4a21e522796fea2320db3.camel@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <89bcab262d6dad4c08c4a21e522796fea2320db3.camel@intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 07:53:38AM -0800, Yu-cheng Yu wrote: > Yes, saving only supervisor states is optimal, but doing XSAVES with a > partial RFBM changes xcomp_bv. ... and that means what exactly in plain english? -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette