Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] erofs: correct the remaining shrink objects

Gao Xiang
2020-02-29T01:13:03Z

Hi,

On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 07:44:50PM +0000, Sasha Levin wrote:
> Hi
>
> [This is an automated email]
>
> This commit has been processed because it contains a "Fixes:" tag
> fixing commit: e7e9a307be9d ("staging: erofs: introduce workstation for decompression").
>
> The bot has tested the following trees: v5.5.6, v5.4.22, v4.19.106.
>
> v5.5.6: Build OK!
> v5.4.22: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies:
> bda17a4577da ("erofs: remove dead code since managed cache is now built-in")
>
> v4.19.106: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies:
> 05f9d4a0c8c4 ("staging: erofs: use the new LZ4_decompress_safe_partial()")
> 0a64d62d5399 ("staging: erofs: fixed -Wmissing-prototype warnings by making functions static.")
> 14f362b4f405 ("staging: erofs: clean up internal.h")
> 152a333a5895 ("staging: erofs: add compacted compression indexes support")
> 22fe04a77d10 ("staging: erofs: clean up shrinker stuffs")
> 3b423417d0d1 ("staging: erofs: clean up erofs_map_blocks_iter")
> 5fb76bb04216 ("staging: erofs: cleanup `z_erofs_vle_normalaccess_readpages'")
> 6e78901a9f23 ("staging: erofs: separate erofs_get_meta_page")
> 7dd68b147d60 ("staging: erofs: use explicit unsigned int type")
> 7fc45dbc938a ("staging: erofs: introduce generic decompression backend")
> 89fcd8360e7b ("staging: erofs: change 'unsigned' to 'unsigned int'")
> 8be31270362b ("staging: erofs: introduce erofs_grab_bio")
> ab47dd2b0819 ("staging: erofs: cleanup z_erofs_vle_work_{lookup, register}")
> bda17a4577da ("erofs: remove dead code since managed cache is now built-in")
> d1ab82443bed ("staging: erofs: Modify conditional checks")
> e7dfb1cff65b ("staging: erofs: fixed -Wmissing-prototype warnings by moving prototypes to header file.")
> f0950b02a74c ("staging: erofs: Modify coding style alignments")

I will manually backport this if it can not be automatically applied.

Thanks,
Gao Xiang

>
>
> NOTE: The patch will not be queued to stable trees until it is upstream.
>
> How should we proceed with this patch?
>
> --
> Thanks
> Sasha