From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>
To: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>
Cc: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
"Petr Mladek" <pmladek@suse.com>,
"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Lech Perczak" <l.perczak@camlintechnologies.com>,
"Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>,
"Krzysztof Drobiński" <k.drobinski@camlintechnologies.com>,
"Pawel Lenkow" <p.lenkow@camlintechnologies.com>,
"John Ogness" <john.ogness@linutronix.de>,
"Tejun Heo" <tj@kernel.org>,
"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: Regression in v4.19.106 breaking waking up of readers of /proc/kmsg and /dev/kmsg
Date: Sat, 29 Feb 2020 13:08:06 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200229040806.GA72248@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200229033253.GA212847@google.com>
On (20/02/29 12:32), Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> > I'm wondering now if we should revert this commit before 5.6 comes out
> > (it landed in 5.6-rc1). "Is much less likely to happen given the
> > other random initialization patches" is not the same as "guaranteed
> > not to happen".
> >
> > What do folks think?
>
> Well, my 5 cents, there is nothing that prevents "too-early"
> printk_deferred() calls in the future. From that POV I'd probably
> prefer to "forbid" printk_deffered() to touch per-CPU deferred
> machinery until it's not "too early" anymore. Similar to what we
> do in printk_safe::queue_flush_work().
Informal patch
=====
Subject: [PATCH] printk: defer printk_deferred() until irq_work is ready
Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
---
kernel/printk/internal.h | 3 +++
kernel/printk/printk.c | 6 ++++++
kernel/printk/printk_safe.c | 11 ++++++++---
3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/printk/internal.h b/kernel/printk/internal.h
index c8e6ab689d42..2f051fb83c00 100644
--- a/kernel/printk/internal.h
+++ b/kernel/printk/internal.h
@@ -23,6 +23,8 @@ __printf(1, 0) int vprintk_func(const char *fmt, va_list args);
void __printk_safe_enter(void);
void __printk_safe_exit(void);
+bool printk_irq_work_ready(void);
+
#define printk_safe_enter_irqsave(flags) \
do { \
local_irq_save(flags); \
@@ -64,4 +66,5 @@ __printf(1, 0) int vprintk_func(const char *fmt, va_list args) { return 0; }
#define printk_safe_enter_irq() local_irq_disable()
#define printk_safe_exit_irq() local_irq_enable()
+bool printk_irq_work_ready(void) { return false; }
#endif /* CONFIG_PRINTK */
diff --git a/kernel/printk/printk.c b/kernel/printk/printk.c
index ad4606234545..bb545c86124e 100644
--- a/kernel/printk/printk.c
+++ b/kernel/printk/printk.c
@@ -3009,6 +3009,9 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct irq_work, wake_up_klogd_work) = {
void wake_up_klogd(void)
{
+ if (!printk_irq_work_ready())
+ return;
+
preempt_disable();
if (waitqueue_active(&log_wait)) {
this_cpu_or(printk_pending, PRINTK_PENDING_WAKEUP);
@@ -3019,6 +3022,9 @@ void wake_up_klogd(void)
void defer_console_output(void)
{
+ if (!printk_irq_work_ready())
+ return;
+
preempt_disable();
__this_cpu_or(printk_pending, PRINTK_PENDING_OUTPUT);
irq_work_queue(this_cpu_ptr(&wake_up_klogd_work));
diff --git a/kernel/printk/printk_safe.c b/kernel/printk/printk_safe.c
index b4045e782743..5d2c282984d0 100644
--- a/kernel/printk/printk_safe.c
+++ b/kernel/printk/printk_safe.c
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@
* There are situations when we want to make sure that all buffers
* were handled or when IRQs are blocked.
*/
-static int printk_safe_irq_ready __read_mostly;
+static bool __printk_irq_work_ready __read_mostly;
#define SAFE_LOG_BUF_LEN ((1 << CONFIG_PRINTK_SAFE_LOG_BUF_SHIFT) - \
sizeof(atomic_t) - \
@@ -48,10 +48,15 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, printk_context);
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct printk_safe_seq_buf, nmi_print_seq);
#endif
+bool printk_irq_work_ready(void)
+{
+ return __printk_irq_work_ready;
+}
+
/* Get flushed in a more safe context. */
static void queue_flush_work(struct printk_safe_seq_buf *s)
{
- if (printk_safe_irq_ready)
+ if (printk_irq_work_ready())
irq_work_queue(&s->work);
}
@@ -408,7 +413,7 @@ void __init printk_safe_init(void)
* variable is set.
*/
barrier();
- printk_safe_irq_ready = 1;
+ __printk_irq_work_ready = true;
/* Flush pending messages that did not have scheduled IRQ works. */
printk_safe_flush();
--
2.25.0.265.gbab2e86ba0-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-29 4:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-27 11:09 Regression in v4.19.106 breaking waking up of readers of /proc/kmsg and /dev/kmsg Lech Perczak
2020-02-27 12:36 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-02-27 12:39 ` Lech Perczak
2020-02-27 14:08 ` Lech Perczak
2020-02-28 3:13 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2020-02-28 9:11 ` John Ogness
2020-02-28 12:02 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2020-02-28 10:04 ` Petr Mladek
2020-02-28 10:58 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-02-28 11:32 ` Petr Mladek
2020-02-28 11:39 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-02-28 13:02 ` Petr Mladek
2020-02-28 13:41 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-02-28 20:53 ` Theodore Y. Ts'o
2020-02-29 3:32 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2020-02-29 4:08 ` Sergey Senozhatsky [this message]
2020-02-29 23:47 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-03-01 5:22 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2020-03-02 9:49 ` Petr Mladek
2020-03-02 9:59 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2020-02-28 11:49 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200229040806.GA72248@google.com \
--to=sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=john.ogness@linutronix.de \
--cc=k.drobinski@camlintechnologies.com \
--cc=l.perczak@camlintechnologies.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=p.lenkow@camlintechnologies.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox