public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
To: sunjunyong <sunjy516@gmail.com>
Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, rafael@kernel.org,
	sunjunyong@xiaomi.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] firmware: fix a double abort case with fw_load_sysfs_fallback
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2020 18:40:57 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200302184057.GB11244@42.do-not-panic.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200302092301.GA25139@mi-OptiPlex-7050>

On Mon, Mar 02, 2020 at 05:23:01PM +0800, sunjunyong wrote:
> Hi Luis:
> 
> This issue is caused by concurrent situation like below:
> when thread 1# wait firmware loading, thread 2# may write -1 to abort
> loading and wakeup thread 1# before it timeout.  so
> wait_for_completion_killable_timeout of thread 1# would return
> remaining time which is != 0 with fw_st->status FW_STATUS_ABORTED.
> And the results would be converted into err -ENOENT in
> __fw_state_wait_common and transfered to fw_load_sysfs_fallback in
> thread 1#.  The -ENOENT means firmware status is already at ABORTED,
> so fw_load_sysfs_fallback no need to get mutex to abort again.
> BTW,the double abort issue would not cause kernel panic but slow down
> it sometimes.

OK so just clarify in your patch's commit log that without your change
you'd just abort twice, it would not create an issue, and the change is
just a minor optimization.

Can you re-submit with that change?

  Luis

> -----------------------------
> thread 1#,wait for loading
> fw_load_sysfs_fallback
>  ->fw_sysfs_wait_timeout
>     ->__fw_state_wait_common
>        ->wait_for_completion_killable_timeout
> 
> in __fw_state_wait_common,
> ...
> 93	ret = wait_for_completion_killable_timeout(&fw_st->completion, timeout);
> 94	if (ret != 0 && fw_st->status == FW_STATUS_ABORTED)
> 95		return -ENOENT;
> 96	if (!ret)
> 97		return -ETIMEDOUT;
> 98
> 99	return ret < 0 ? ret : 0;
> -----------------------------
> thread 2#, write -1 to abort loading
> firmware_loading_store
>  ->fw_load_abort
>    ->__fw_load_abort
>      ->fw_state_aborted
>        ->__fw_state_set
>          ->complete_all 
> 
> in __fw_state_set,
> ...
> 111         if (status == FW_STATUS_DONE || status == FW_STATUS_ABORTED)
> 112                 complete_all(&fw_st->completion);
> ...
> -----------------------------
> On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 01:07:35PM +0000, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 03:56:33PM +0800, Junyong Sun wrote:
> > > fw_sysfs_wait_timeout may return err with -ENOENT
> > > at fw_load_sysfs_fallback and firmware is already
> > > in abort status, no need to abort again, so skip it.
> > 
> > What exactly is caused by this issue though? Are you seeing
> > a kernel panic, some extra messages in the kernel log? This
> > informationw ould be useful for the kernel commit log.
> > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Junyong Sun <sunjunyong@xiaomi.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/base/firmware_loader/fallback.c | 2 +-
> > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/base/firmware_loader/fallback.c b/drivers/base/firmware_loader/fallback.c
> > > index 8704e1b..1e9c96e 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/base/firmware_loader/fallback.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/base/firmware_loader/fallback.c
> > > @@ -525,7 +525,7 @@ static int fw_load_sysfs_fallback(struct fw_sysfs *fw_sysfs,
> > >  	}
> > >  
> > >  	retval = fw_sysfs_wait_timeout(fw_priv, timeout);
> > > -	if (retval < 0) {
> > > +	if (retval < 0 && retval != -ENOENT) {
> > >  		mutex_lock(&fw_lock);
> > >  		fw_load_abort(fw_sysfs);
> > >  		mutex_unlock(&fw_lock);
> > > -- 
> > > 2.7.4
> > > 

      reply	other threads:[~2020-03-02 18:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-02-28  7:56 [PATCH] firmware: fix a double abort case with fw_load_sysfs_fallback Junyong Sun
2020-02-28 13:07 ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-03-02  9:23   ` sunjunyong
2020-03-02 18:40     ` Luis Chamberlain [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200302184057.GB11244@42.do-not-panic.com \
    --to=mcgrof@kernel.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=sunjunyong@xiaomi.com \
    --cc=sunjy516@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox