From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] powerpc: kvm: no need to check return value of debugfs_create functions
Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2020 09:50:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200303085039.GA1323622@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87imjlswxc.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au>
On Tue, Mar 03, 2020 at 06:46:23PM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> writes:
> > When calling debugfs functions, there is no need to ever check the
> > return value. The function can work or not, but the code logic should
> > never do something different based on this.
>
> Except it does need to do something different, if the file was created
> it needs to be removed in the remove path.
>
> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/timing.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/timing.c
> > index bfe4f106cffc..8e4791c6f2af 100644
> > --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/timing.c
> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/timing.c
> > @@ -207,19 +207,12 @@ static const struct file_operations kvmppc_exit_timing_fops = {
> > void kvmppc_create_vcpu_debugfs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int id)
> > {
> > static char dbg_fname[50];
> > - struct dentry *debugfs_file;
> >
> > snprintf(dbg_fname, sizeof(dbg_fname), "vm%u_vcpu%u_timing",
> > current->pid, id);
> > - debugfs_file = debugfs_create_file(dbg_fname, 0666,
> > - kvm_debugfs_dir, vcpu,
> > - &kvmppc_exit_timing_fops);
> > -
> > - if (!debugfs_file) {
> > - printk(KERN_ERR"%s: error creating debugfs file %s\n",
> > - __func__, dbg_fname);
> > - return;
> > - }
> > + debugfs_create_file(dbg_fname, 0666, kvm_debugfs_dir, vcpu,
> > + &kvmppc_exit_timing_fops);
> > +
> >
> > vcpu->arch.debugfs_exit_timing = debugfs_file;
Ugh, you are right, how did I miss that? How is 0-day missing this?
It's been in my tree for a long time, odd.
> > }
>
> This doesn't build:
>
> arch/powerpc/kvm/timing.c:217:35: error: 'debugfs_file' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'debugfs_file_put'?
>
> We can't just drop the assignment, we need the dentry to do the removal:
>
> void kvmppc_remove_vcpu_debugfs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> {
> if (vcpu->arch.debugfs_exit_timing) {
> debugfs_remove(vcpu->arch.debugfs_exit_timing);
> vcpu->arch.debugfs_exit_timing = NULL;
> }
> }
>
>
> I squashed this in, which seems to work:
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/timing.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/timing.c
> index 8e4791c6f2af..5b7a66f86bd5 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/timing.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/timing.c
> @@ -207,19 +207,19 @@ static const struct file_operations kvmppc_exit_timing_fops = {
> void kvmppc_create_vcpu_debugfs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int id)
> {
> static char dbg_fname[50];
> + struct dentry *debugfs_file;
>
> snprintf(dbg_fname, sizeof(dbg_fname), "vm%u_vcpu%u_timing",
> current->pid, id);
> - debugfs_create_file(dbg_fname, 0666, kvm_debugfs_dir, vcpu,
> - &kvmppc_exit_timing_fops);
> -
> + debugfs_file = debugfs_create_file(dbg_fname, 0666, kvm_debugfs_dir,
> + vcpu, &kvmppc_exit_timing_fops);
>
> vcpu->arch.debugfs_exit_timing = debugfs_file;
That works, yes.
> }
>
> void kvmppc_remove_vcpu_debugfs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> {
> - if (vcpu->arch.debugfs_exit_timing) {
> + if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(vcpu->arch.debugfs_exit_timing)) {
> debugfs_remove(vcpu->arch.debugfs_exit_timing);
> vcpu->arch.debugfs_exit_timing = NULL;
> }
No, this can just be:
debugfs_remove(vcpu->arch.debugfs_exit_timing);
No need to check anything, just call it and the debugfs code can handle
it just fine.
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-03 8:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-09 10:58 [PATCH 1/6] powerpc: kernel: no need to check return value of debugfs_create functions Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-02-09 10:58 ` [PATCH 2/6] powerpc: kvm: " Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-03-03 7:46 ` Michael Ellerman
2020-03-03 8:50 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2020-03-03 9:45 ` Michael Ellerman
2020-03-03 9:58 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-03-03 10:32 ` Michael Ellerman
2020-02-09 10:58 ` [PATCH 3/6] powerpc: mm: book3s64: hash_utils: " Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-02-09 10:58 ` [PATCH 4/6] powerpc: mm: ptdump: " Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-02-09 10:59 ` [PATCH 5/6] powerpc: cell: axon_msi: " Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-02-09 10:59 ` [PATCH 6/6] powerpc: powernv: " Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-02-10 15:01 ` Oliver O'Halloran
2020-02-10 15:19 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-03-03 9:52 ` Michael Ellerman
2020-03-06 0:27 ` [PATCH 1/6] powerpc: kernel: " Michael Ellerman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200303085039.GA1323622@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=paulus@ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox