From: joeyli <jlee@suse.com>
To: Vladis Dronov <vdronov@redhat.com>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
linux-efi <linux-efi@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] efi: fix a race and a buffer overflow while reading efivars via sysfs
Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2020 14:51:22 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200304065122.GK16878@linux-l9pv.suse> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <358842423.12639861.1583231098544.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com>
Hi all,
On Tue, Mar 03, 2020 at 05:24:58AM -0500, Vladis Dronov wrote:
> Hello, Ard, all,
>
> > > Wouldn't it be easier to pass a var_data_size stack variable into
> > > efivar_entry_get(), and only update the value in 'var' if it is <=
> > > 1024?
> > >
> >
> > I was thinking about this approach, but this way we still do not protect
> > var from a concurrent access. For example, efivar_data_read() can race
> > with itself:
>
> Oh, indeed, this race is not possible the way you sugget with a var_data_size
> stack variable. Unfortunately, AFAIU, the read/write race stays:
>
> > ... efivar read functions still can race with the write function
> > efivar_store_raw(). Surely, the race window is much smaller but it is there.
> > I strongly believe we need to protect all data accesses here with a lock.
>
Looks that kernel uses EFI protocol to query variable everytime, then
why should kernel keeps a copy of variable data size, data and attributes in
memory? It makes sense to keep VariableName and VendorGuid, but why data?
The efi_variable can be used to interactive with userland. But we do not
need to keep a data copy in efi_variable with efivar_entry. e.g. The
efivarfs_file_read() allocates a buffer for reading variable instead
of using efi_variable->Data.
Regards
Joey Lee
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-04 6:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-03 8:55 [PATCH] efi: fix a race and a buffer overflow while reading efivars via sysfs Vladis Dronov
2020-03-03 9:15 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-03-03 10:14 ` Vladis Dronov
2020-03-03 10:20 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-03-03 10:24 ` Vladis Dronov
2020-03-04 6:51 ` joeyli [this message]
2020-03-04 15:45 ` Vladis Dronov
2020-03-04 15:47 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-03-04 15:49 ` [PATCH v2] " Vladis Dronov
2020-03-04 15:57 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-03-04 17:18 ` Vladis Dronov
2020-03-04 17:21 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-03-05 6:01 ` joeyli
2020-03-05 6:17 ` Vladis Dronov
2020-03-05 8:40 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] efi: fix a race and add a sanity check Vladis Dronov
2020-03-05 8:40 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] efi: fix a race and a buffer overflow while reading efivars via sysfs Vladis Dronov
2020-03-05 8:45 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-03-05 10:52 ` Vladis Dronov
2020-03-08 16:38 ` [tip: efi/urgent] efi: Fix " tip-bot2 for Vladis Dronov
2020-03-05 8:40 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] efi: add a sanity check to efivar_store_raw() Vladis Dronov
2020-03-08 16:38 ` [tip: efi/urgent] efi: Add " tip-bot2 for Vladis Dronov
2020-03-05 8:40 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] efi: fix a mistype in comments mentioning efivar_entry_iter_begin() Vladis Dronov
2020-03-05 8:51 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] efi: fix a race and add a sanity check Ard Biesheuvel
2020-03-04 14:07 ` [PATCH] efi: fix a race and a buffer overflow while reading efivars via sysfs joeyli
2020-03-04 16:06 ` Vladis Dronov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200304065122.GK16878@linux-l9pv.suse \
--to=jlee@suse.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vdronov@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox