From: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
To: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] KVM: VMX: untangle VMXON revision_id setting when using eVMCS
Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2020 12:10:00 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200305201000.GQ11500@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200305183725.28872-3-vkuznets@redhat.com>
On Thu, Mar 05, 2020 at 07:37:25PM +0100, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> As stated in alloc_vmxon_regions(), VMXON region needs to be tagged with
> revision id from MSR_IA32_VMX_BASIC even in case of eVMCS. The logic to
> do so is not very straightforward: first, we set
> hdr.revision_id = KVM_EVMCS_VERSION in alloc_vmcs_cpu() just to reset it
> back to vmcs_config.revision_id in alloc_vmxon_regions(). Simplify this by
> introducing 'enum vmcs_type' parameter to alloc_vmcs_cpu().
>
> No functional change intended.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
> ---
...
> + * However, even though not explicitly documented by TLFS, VMXArea
> + * passed as VMXON argument should still be marked with revision_id
> + * reported by physical CPU.
LOL, nice.
> + */
> + if (type != VMXON_REGION && static_branch_unlikely(&enable_evmcs))
> vmcs->hdr.revision_id = KVM_EVMCS_VERSION;
> else
> vmcs->hdr.revision_id = vmcs_config.revision_id;
>
> - if (shadow)
> + if (type == SHADOW_VMCS_REGION)
> vmcs->hdr.shadow_vmcs = 1;
> return vmcs;
> }
> -struct vmcs *alloc_vmcs_cpu(bool shadow, int cpu, gfp_t flags);
> +enum vmcs_type {
> + VMXON_REGION,
> + VMCS_REGION,
> + SHADOW_VMCS_REGION,
> +};
> +
> +struct vmcs *alloc_vmcs_cpu(enum vmcs_type type, int cpu, gfp_t flags);
> void free_vmcs(struct vmcs *vmcs);
> int alloc_loaded_vmcs(struct loaded_vmcs *loaded_vmcs);
> void free_loaded_vmcs(struct loaded_vmcs *loaded_vmcs);
> @@ -498,8 +504,8 @@ void loaded_vmcs_clear(struct loaded_vmcs *loaded_vmcs);
>
> static inline struct vmcs *alloc_vmcs(bool shadow)
I think it'd be cleaner overall to take "enum vmcs_type" in alloc_vmcs().
Then the ternary operator goes away and the callers (all two of 'em) are
self-documenting. E.g.
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
index 79c7764c77b1..2c8a0a1386b1 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
@@ -4566,7 +4566,7 @@ static struct vmcs *alloc_shadow_vmcs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
WARN_ON(loaded_vmcs == &vmx->vmcs01 && loaded_vmcs->shadow_vmcs);
if (!loaded_vmcs->shadow_vmcs) {
- loaded_vmcs->shadow_vmcs = alloc_vmcs(true);
+ loaded_vmcs->shadow_vmcs = alloc_vmcs(SHADOW_VMCS_REGION);
if (loaded_vmcs->shadow_vmcs)
vmcs_clear(loaded_vmcs->shadow_vmcs);
}
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
index 5bdf6919de83..4634f6d7d55a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
@@ -2605,7 +2605,7 @@ void free_loaded_vmcs(struct loaded_vmcs *loaded_vmcs)
int alloc_loaded_vmcs(struct loaded_vmcs *loaded_vmcs)
{
- loaded_vmcs->vmcs = alloc_vmcs(false);
+ loaded_vmcs->vmcs = alloc_vmcs(VMCS_REGION);
if (!loaded_vmcs->vmcs)
return -ENOMEM;
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h
index 4c327030bb9c..a5eb92638ac2 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h
@@ -502,10 +502,10 @@ void free_loaded_vmcs(struct loaded_vmcs *loaded_vmcs);
void loaded_vmcs_init(struct loaded_vmcs *loaded_vmcs);
void loaded_vmcs_clear(struct loaded_vmcs *loaded_vmcs);
-static inline struct vmcs *alloc_vmcs(bool shadow)
+static inline struct vmcs *alloc_vmcs(enum vmcs_type type)
{
- return alloc_vmcs_cpu(shadow ? SHADOW_VMCS_REGION : VMCS_REGION,
- raw_smp_processor_id(), GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT);
+ return alloc_vmcs_cpu(type, raw_smp_processor_id(),
+ GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT);
}
u64 construct_eptp(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long root_hpa);
> {
> - return alloc_vmcs_cpu(shadow, raw_smp_processor_id(),
> - GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT);
> + return alloc_vmcs_cpu(shadow ? SHADOW_VMCS_REGION : VMCS_REGION,
> + raw_smp_processor_id(), GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT);
> }
>
> u64 construct_eptp(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long root_hpa);
> --
> 2.24.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-05 20:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-05 18:37 [PATCH v2 0/2] KVM: VMX: cleanup VMXON region allocation Vitaly Kuznetsov
2020-03-05 18:37 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] KVM: VMX: rename 'kvm_area' to 'vmxon_region' Vitaly Kuznetsov
2020-03-05 18:37 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] KVM: VMX: untangle VMXON revision_id setting when using eVMCS Vitaly Kuznetsov
2020-03-05 20:10 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2020-03-06 10:06 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200305201000.GQ11500@linux.intel.com \
--to=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox