public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@v3.sk>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] irqchip/mmp: A pair of robustness fixed
Date: Sun, 8 Mar 2020 15:46:04 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200308143814.GA150394@furthur.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200308140434.18b0f947@why>

On Sun, Mar 08, 2020 at 02:04:34PM +0000, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Feb 2020 09:00:22 +0100
> Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@v3.sk> wrote:
> 
> [+RobH]
> 
> Lubomir,
> 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > please consider applying these two patches. Thery are not strictly
> > necessary, but improve diagnostics in case the DT is faulty.
> 
> Can't we instead make sure our DT infrastructure checks for these? I'm
> very reluctant to add more "DT validation" to the kernel, as it feels
> like the wrong place to do this.

These are not really problems of the DT infrastructure. It's that the
driver has some constrains resulting from use of global data ([PATCH 1])
and statically sized arrays ([PATCH 2]) without enforcing them.

It's probably easier to mess up DT than to mess up board files, but
regardless of that, being a little defensive and checking the bounds of
arrays is probably a good programming practice anyways.

Thank you
Lubo

  reply	other threads:[~2020-03-08 14:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-02-19  8:00 [PATCH 0/2] irqchip/mmp: A pair of robustness fixed Lubomir Rintel
2020-02-19  8:00 ` [PATCH 1/2] irqchip/mmp: Safeguard against multiple root intc initialization Lubomir Rintel
2020-02-19  8:00 ` [PATCH 2/2] irqchip/mmp: Avoid overflowing icu_data[] Lubomir Rintel
2020-03-08 14:04 ` [PATCH 0/2] irqchip/mmp: A pair of robustness fixed Marc Zyngier
2020-03-08 14:46   ` Lubomir Rintel [this message]
2020-03-08 17:26     ` Marc Zyngier
2020-03-09 10:10       ` Lubomir Rintel
2020-03-09 16:13   ` Rob Herring

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200308143814.GA150394@furthur.local \
    --to=lkundrak@v3.sk \
    --cc=jason@lakedaemon.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox