From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
kernel test robot <rong.a.chen@intel.com>,
Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
x86-ml <x86@kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>,
lkp@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [futex] 8019ad13ef: will-it-scale.per_process_ops -97.8% regression
Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2020 09:51:23 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200309085123.GE12561@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87h7yy90ve.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
On Sun, Mar 08, 2020 at 07:07:17PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Right you are. The pointer needs to be the starting point as it moved
> ahead of word, which means it starts at word and hashes word and
> offset and an extra u32 beyond the end of the key.
>
> Thanks,
>
> tglx
> ----
> diff --git a/kernel/futex.c b/kernel/futex.c
> index e14f7cd45dbd..9f3251349f65 100644
> --- a/kernel/futex.c
> +++ b/kernel/futex.c
> @@ -385,8 +385,8 @@ static inline int hb_waiters_pending(struct futex_hash_bucket *hb)
> */
> static struct futex_hash_bucket *hash_futex(union futex_key *key)
> {
> - u32 hash = jhash2((u32*)&key->both.word,
> - (sizeof(key->both.word)+sizeof(key->both.ptr))/4,
> + u32 hash = jhash2((u32*)&key->both.ptr,
> + (sizeof(key->both.ptr) + sizeof(key->both.word)) / 4,
> key->both.offset);
> return &futex_queues[hash & (futex_hashsize - 1)];
> }
Groan... I've gotta ask, why isn't that written like:
u32 hash = jhash2((u32 *)key,
offsetof(typeof(*key), offset) / 4
key->both.offset);
Or better yet:
u32 hash = jhash((u32 *)key, sizeof(*key) / 4, 0);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-09 8:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-08 14:02 [futex] 8019ad13ef: will-it-scale.per_process_ops -97.8% regression kernel test robot
[not found] ` <CAHk-=wgJV7xrxsTkOG203huPShzZBEC6N_BG0KGwHBmEq4yqWg@mail.gmail.com>
2020-03-08 15:28 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-03-08 18:07 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-09 8:26 ` kernel test robot
2020-03-09 8:51 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2020-03-09 9:34 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-09 21:42 ` [tip: locking/urgent] futex: Unbreak futex hashing tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-11 8:20 ` [futex] 8019ad13ef: will-it-scale.per_process_ops -97.8% regression Thierry Reding
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200309085123.GE12561@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=bp@suse.de \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@lists.01.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=rong.a.chen@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox