From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4201C10DCE for ; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 05:49:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2DF524673 for ; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 05:49:54 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1583819394; bh=BkVtYbEL7jQXYjPwzqGSfq30uw8E2tp1PNvu20vn5gk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=Kqhq8veeE/YjFZTwutf5a45XSo0Pw5k40SpEuL9yTfiXBBpaSEUw+ckq6CLzIJrCm AzeAfqTqn579fyc/YV9XPvboS6rRj8TkeiRG6NK0hyBZI0nYPh2gw+rXsnWQMl/VPA WJrKVnhKDPI3pExYRkgKvcT36qhqRMEu/ll1CC0I= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726224AbgCJFtx (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Mar 2020 01:49:53 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:41866 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726100AbgCJFtx (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Mar 2020 01:49:53 -0400 Received: from dragon (80.251.214.228.16clouds.com [80.251.214.228]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6D8972464B; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 05:49:50 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1583819392; bh=BkVtYbEL7jQXYjPwzqGSfq30uw8E2tp1PNvu20vn5gk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=shPr6w5QC++tYZlE0GQrDIG7OdSGlKl6yHDpSXTd+SNtOVYI9MAhyn7VRnGQ3Wlza e+rDK63LmB/i3YfkF7S7PrhT6VZvf/M8H4dWC7oKROWRb/4vjp/kNjDxlXVlXiyITx 5sBLUeEVcbGBQN6nqAW2G8eQJzkW+maEfsNsiGZs= Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 13:49:46 +0800 From: Shawn Guo To: peng.fan@nxp.com Cc: s.hauer@pengutronix.de, sboyd@kernel.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, viresh.kumar@linaro.org, rjw@rjwysocki.net, kernel@pengutronix.de, festevam@gmail.com, linux-imx@nxp.com, Anson.Huang@nxp.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, abel.vesa@nxp.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/14] dt-bindings: fsl: add i.MX7ULP PMC binding doc Message-ID: <20200310054945.GE15729@dragon> References: <1582099197-20327-1-git-send-email-peng.fan@nxp.com> <1582099197-20327-2-git-send-email-peng.fan@nxp.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1582099197-20327-2-git-send-email-peng.fan@nxp.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 03:59:44PM +0800, peng.fan@nxp.com wrote: > From: Peng Fan > > Add i.MX7ULP Power Management Controller binding doc > > Signed-off-by: Peng Fan This is a new binding, and I would like get an ACK from Rob on it. > --- > .../bindings/arm/freescale/imx7ulp_pmc.yaml | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/freescale/imx7ulp_pmc.yaml > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/freescale/imx7ulp_pmc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/freescale/imx7ulp_pmc.yaml > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000000..992a5ea29d39 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/freescale/imx7ulp_pmc.yaml > @@ -0,0 +1,32 @@ > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > +%YAML 1.2 > +--- > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/bindings/arm/freescale/imx7ulp_pmc.yaml# > +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml# > + > +title: i.MX7ULP Power Management Controller(PMC) Device Tree Bindings > + > +maintainers: > + - Peng Fan > + > +properties: > + compatible: > + items: > + - enum: > + - fsl,imx7ulp-pmc0 > + - fsl,imx7ulp-pmc1 We usually do not encode number suffix in the compatible string. Do they really have different programming model? Shawn > + > + reg: > + maxItems: 1 > + > +required: > + - compatible > + - reg > + > +examples: > + - | > + pmc0: pmc0@410a1000 { > + compatible = "fsl,imx7ulp-pmc0"; > + reg = <0x410a1000 0x1000>; > + }; > +... > -- > 2.16.4 >