From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>, Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Bruce Rogers <brogers@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/ioremap: Map EFI runtime services data as encrypted for SEV
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 18:47:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200310174712.GG29372@zn.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200310163738.GF29372@zn.tnic>
On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 05:37:38PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> Let's wrap this in a new function which is called at the end of
> __ioremap_check_mem() instead of trying to map EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES_DATA
> to IORES_DESC types and match the flags just so that we can preserve the
> flow. And add a comment above it why we're doing this.
>
> As you said on IRC, none of the IO resource ranges covers the
> EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES_DATA.
Ok, here's what I have. @joro, I know it is trivially different from the
version you tested but I'd appreciate it if you ran it again, just to be
sure.
Thx.
---
From 244b62ca142c6296361bde953488fc64db31f1bd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 18:35:57 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] x86/ioremap: Map EFI runtime services data as encrypted for
SEV
The dmidecode program fails to properly decode the SMBIOS data supplied
by OVMF/UEFI when running in an SEV guest. The SMBIOS area, under SEV, is
encrypted and resides in reserved memory that is marked as EFI runtime
services data.
As a result, when memremap() is attempted for the SMBIOS data, it
can't be mapped as regular RAM (through try_ram_remap()) and, since
the address isn't part of the iomem resources list, it isn't mapped
encrypted through the fallback ioremap().
Add a new __ioremap_check_other() to deal with memory types like
EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES_DATA which are not covered by the resource ranges.
This allows any runtime services data, which has been created encrypted,
to be mapped encrypted.
[ bp: Move functionality to a separate function. ]
Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 5.3
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/2d9e16eb5b53dc82665c95c6764b7407719df7a0.1582645327.git.thomas.lendacky@amd.com
---
arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c b/arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c
index 44e4beb4239f..935a91e1fd77 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c
@@ -106,6 +106,19 @@ static unsigned int __ioremap_check_encrypted(struct resource *res)
return 0;
}
+/*
+ * The EFI runtime services data area is not covered by walk_mem_res(), but must
+ * be mapped encrypted when SEV is active.
+ */
+static void __ioremap_check_other(resource_size_t addr, struct ioremap_desc *desc)
+{
+ if (!sev_active())
+ return;
+
+ if (efi_mem_type(addr) == EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES_DATA)
+ desc->flags |= IORES_MAP_ENCRYPTED;
+}
+
static int __ioremap_collect_map_flags(struct resource *res, void *arg)
{
struct ioremap_desc *desc = arg;
@@ -124,6 +137,9 @@ static int __ioremap_collect_map_flags(struct resource *res, void *arg)
* To avoid multiple resource walks, this function walks resources marked as
* IORESOURCE_MEM and IORESOURCE_BUSY and looking for system RAM and/or a
* resource described not as IORES_DESC_NONE (e.g. IORES_DESC_ACPI_TABLES).
+ *
+ * After that, deal with misc other ranges in __ioremap_check_other() which do
+ * not fall into the above category.
*/
static void __ioremap_check_mem(resource_size_t addr, unsigned long size,
struct ioremap_desc *desc)
@@ -135,6 +151,8 @@ static void __ioremap_check_mem(resource_size_t addr, unsigned long size,
memset(desc, 0, sizeof(struct ioremap_desc));
walk_mem_res(start, end, desc, __ioremap_collect_map_flags);
+
+ __ioremap_check_other(addr, desc);
}
/*
--
2.21.0
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-10 17:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-25 15:42 [PATCH] x86/ioremap: Map EFI runtime services data as encrypted for SEV Tom Lendacky
2020-03-10 10:25 ` Joerg Roedel
2020-03-10 12:40 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-03-10 13:03 ` Joerg Roedel
2020-03-10 16:37 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-03-10 17:47 ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2020-03-11 9:04 ` Joerg Roedel
2020-03-11 14:56 ` Borislav Petkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200310174712.GG29372@zn.tnic \
--to=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=brogers@suse.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jroedel@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox