From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F08EEC2BB1D for ; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 10:46:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C56202071B for ; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 10:46:43 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=alien8.de header.i=@alien8.de header.b="bqbTBOCp" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726913AbgCLKqm (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Mar 2020 06:46:42 -0400 Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([5.9.137.197]:43030 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725268AbgCLKqm (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Mar 2020 06:46:42 -0400 Received: from zn.tnic (p200300EC2F0DBF00894A3A768C8141DF.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [IPv6:2003:ec:2f0d:bf00:894a:3a76:8c81:41df]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.skyhub.de (SuperMail on ZX Spectrum 128k) with ESMTPSA id EBE0D1EC0CF8; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 11:46:40 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alien8.de; s=dkim; t=1584010001; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references; bh=h9ufmfACEP9wthZWwpWI3tKNBhqEf8SV+AxE3rwYr9c=; b=bqbTBOCppYPX9tpBsHgOizmdTbt4XCOJ7+iJ997dEg5vDu35TdlNOKM8GrnYXJwDHbOK2k hPOV/7eqTYiQkn0+TwNYCv+0fIVIgXc52tGVsprENUj7G5YJ39LgzHbqIEJENmpP7WPowY Z9f5rdKFpPc1OKvrSh3k2c5YhqxjkTI= Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2020 11:46:43 +0100 From: Borislav Petkov To: Jian-Hong Pan Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H . Peter Anvin" , Ard Biesheuvel , Kees Cook , Anton Vorontsov , Colin Cross , Tony Luck , x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, linux@endlessm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "x86/reboot, efi: Use EFI reboot for Acer TravelMate X514-51T" Message-ID: <20200312104643.GA15619@zn.tnic> References: <20200312083341.9365-1-jian-hong@endlessm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200312083341.9365-1-jian-hong@endlessm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 04:33:42PM +0800, Jian-Hong Pan wrote: > This reverts commit 0082517fa4bce073e7cf542633439f26538a14cc. > > According to Acer's information, this reboot issue is fixed since 1.08 > and newer BIOS. So, we can revert the quirk. We can? How do you know *everyone* affected will update their BIOS? And what's the downside of keeping it? -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette