From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87A2CC2BB1D for ; Mon, 16 Mar 2020 15:52:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 636482051A for ; Mon, 16 Mar 2020 15:52:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1732019AbgCPPwg (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Mar 2020 11:52:36 -0400 Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:50432 "EHLO mga09.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1731984AbgCPPwf (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Mar 2020 11:52:35 -0400 IronPort-SDR: PsTGVIaWJVwV6lm6RXikZHUw2r0AK2JWP9pkSZCNMbNGif/eS4A3sLniCrYHPzxHhV5AX0PHX3 ITzeR+8m7/pg== X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga008.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.65]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 16 Mar 2020 08:52:34 -0700 IronPort-SDR: 9zyAWkN3nB4wjhOmEf4Pmw/yZT/SB1Nniyz6/VX2h1j7UqExbvfs+TP/uKG+b02wCSWlFjD6bV MlEAeKpPPj5w== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.70,561,1574150400"; d="scan'208";a="237986234" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com (HELO smile) ([10.237.68.40]) by orsmga008.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 16 Mar 2020 08:52:31 -0700 Received: from andy by smile with local (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1jDs2b-00A6Y7-2Y; Mon, 16 Mar 2020 17:52:33 +0200 Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2020 17:52:33 +0200 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Alexander Shishkin Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , "H. Peter Anvin" , x86@kernel.org, Mark Brown , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Cezary Rojewski , Pierre-Louis Bossart , Liam Girdwood , Jie Yang , alsa-devel@alsa-project.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/9] x86: Easy way of detecting MS Surface 3 Message-ID: <20200316155233.GS1922688@smile.fi.intel.com> References: <20200122112306.64598-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> <871rps9uxd.fsf@ashishki-desk.ger.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <871rps9uxd.fsf@ashishki-desk.ger.corp.intel.com> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 05:33:02PM +0200, Alexander Shishkin wrote: > Andy Shevchenko writes: > > > While working on RTC regression, I noticed that we are using the same DMI check > > over and over in the drivers for MS Surface 3 platform. This series dedicated > > for making it easier in the same way how it's done for Apple machines. > > [...] > > > x86/quirks: Introduce hpet_dev_print_force_hpet_address() helper > > x86/quirks: Join string literals back > > These two don't seem to be related to the Surface 3 cause of the rest of > the patchset, or am I missing something? No, they are not. I think it's suitable to have them in the bunch nevertheless. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko