From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25A2EC10F29 for ; Tue, 17 Mar 2020 15:11:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC1F52075E for ; Tue, 17 Mar 2020 15:11:03 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="dq+RSNrV" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727112AbgCQPLC (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Mar 2020 11:11:02 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-74.mimecast.com ([216.205.24.74]:55932 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-74.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726478AbgCQPLC (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Mar 2020 11:11:02 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1584457861; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=W5HQAvbPU4U3uMqTwVbtXlufV8kjT1jXd8mJ+pSamK4=; b=dq+RSNrVVfgmdkMj/1djImhaKfO4ZAaNDtbihfWo2vWDt8ZVv4ahmSxxZoXdCdN9nPyVjX YXqmi/nrA9GP4Sj3+o8AH/d8YCW6ZbCZxD2DRyFrCnPrJkn6qbEsGatAsLIa++wMEcKTHn lrNHMgvJgGH04G85szykRZ+WPhHboY0= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-479-kEnLFVR7PCuI3hiVy5LX1g-1; Tue, 17 Mar 2020 11:11:00 -0400 X-MC-Unique: kEnLFVR7PCuI3hiVy5LX1g-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B4D28107ACC4; Tue, 17 Mar 2020 15:10:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from krava (unknown [10.40.195.82]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7BE4073865; Tue, 17 Mar 2020 15:10:50 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2020 16:10:47 +0100 From: Jiri Olsa To: Kajol Jain Cc: acme@kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au, sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, anju@linux.vnet.ibm.com, maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com, ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com, peterz@infradead.org, yao.jin@linux.intel.com, ak@linux.intel.com, jolsa@kernel.org, kan.liang@linux.intel.com, jmario@redhat.com, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, mingo@kernel.org, paulus@ozlabs.org, namhyung@kernel.org, mpetlan@redhat.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, benh@kernel.crashing.org, mamatha4@linux.vnet.ibm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, tglx@linutronix.de Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 09/11] perf/tools: Enhance JSON/metric infrastructure to handle "?" Message-ID: <20200317151047.GF757893@krava> References: <20200317062333.14555-1-kjain@linux.ibm.com> <20200317062333.14555-10-kjain@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200317062333.14555-10-kjain@linux.ibm.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.15 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 11:53:31AM +0530, Kajol Jain wrote: SBIP > +static int metricgroup__add_metric_runtime_param(struct strbuf *events, > + struct list_head *group_list, struct pmu_event *pe) > +{ > + int i, count; > + int ret = -EINVAL; > + > + count = arch_get_runtimeparam(); > + > + /* This loop is added to create multiple > + * events depend on count value and add > + * those events to group_list. > + */ > + > + for (i = 0; i < count; i++) { > + const char **ids; > + int idnum; > + struct egroup *eg; > + char value[PATH_MAX]; > + > + if (expr__find_other(pe->metric_expr, NULL, &ids, &idnum, i) < 0) > + return ret; > + > + if (events->len > 0) > + strbuf_addf(events, ","); > + > + if (metricgroup__has_constraint(pe)) > + metricgroup__add_metric_non_group(events, ids, idnum); > + else > + metricgroup__add_metric_weak_group(events, ids, idnum); > + > + eg = malloc(sizeof(*eg)); > + if (!eg) { > + ret = -ENOMEM; > + return ret; > + } > + > + sprintf(value, "%s%c%d", pe->metric_name, '_', i); > + eg->ids = ids; > + eg->idnum = idnum; > + eg->metric_name = strdup(value); > + if (!eg->metric_name) { > + ret = -ENOMEM; > + return ret; > + } > + > + eg->metric_expr = pe->metric_expr; > + eg->metric_unit = pe->unit; > + list_add_tail(&eg->nd, group_list); > + ret = 0; > + > + if (ret != 0) > + break; again, this is part of metricgroup__add_metric_param no? why not use it? jirka