From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06160C4332D for ; Thu, 19 Mar 2020 10:28:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C38D620739 for ; Thu, 19 Mar 2020 10:28:30 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=alien8.de header.i=@alien8.de header.b="dypae57F" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727089AbgCSK23 (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Mar 2020 06:28:29 -0400 Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([5.9.137.197]:57538 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726802AbgCSK23 (ORCPT ); Thu, 19 Mar 2020 06:28:29 -0400 Received: from zn.tnic (p200300EC2F0A850035180F69CBC86220.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [IPv6:2003:ec:2f0a:8500:3518:f69:cbc8:6220]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.skyhub.de (SuperMail on ZX Spectrum 128k) with ESMTPSA id C77D31EC0CF9; Thu, 19 Mar 2020 11:28:27 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alien8.de; s=dkim; t=1584613707; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references; bh=iZUZhIBkCAhoEjiFaedPIp77BnKEXPzFG3udsiDWQxc=; b=dypae57FKE5rQct1uVw9z0eRqwwakJqg6wApvPGh+7jfpxaIYR9NvqV9dcyEoHaQhwxgS1 SyvVx/9MAyVls4z0HFyj86rMEjzesgL6031uOQFgJUVuTia2O/DFwyOCcnYoUJCzSSUw5a 7IXXW0Qn9kLr8AQU+YnSYTs99pl6VAE= Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2020 11:28:34 +0100 From: Borislav Petkov To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: lkml , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Paul Mackerras , Michael Ellerman , Heiko Carstens , Vasily Gorbik , Christian Borntraeger , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , x86@kernel.org, Dave Hansen , Andy Lutomirski , Peter Zijlstra , Marek Szyprowski , Robin Murphy , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, Tom Lendacky Subject: Re: [PATCH -v2] treewide: Rename "unencrypted" to "decrypted" Message-ID: <20200319102834.GC13073@zn.tnic> References: <20200317111822.GA15609@zn.tnic> <20200319101657.GB13073@zn.tnic> <20200319102011.GA3617@lst.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200319102011.GA3617@lst.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 11:20:11AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > I thought we agreed that decrypted is absolutely the wrong term. I don't think we did. At least I don't know where we did that. > So NAK - if you want to change things it needs to go the other way. We are already using "decrypted" everywhere in arch/x86/. Changing that would be a *lot* more churn. And it is just a term, for chrissakes, to denote memory which is not encrypted. And it would make our lifes easier if we had only *two* terms instead of three or more. Especially if the concept we denote with this is a binary one: encrypted memory and *not* encrypted memory. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette