public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
To: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	tiwai@suse.de, broonie@kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
	jank@cadence.com, srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org,
	slawomir.blauciak@intel.com,
	Bard liao <yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com>,
	Rander Wang <rander.wang@linux.intel.com>,
	Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com>,
	Hui Wang <hui.wang@canonical.com>,
	Sanyog Kale <sanyog.r.kale@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] soundwire: intel: add mutex to prevent concurrent access to SHIM registers
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2020 19:11:12 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200320134112.GC4885@vkoul-mobl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200311221026.18174-4-pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>

On 11-03-20, 17:10, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
> Some of the SHIM registers exposed fields that are link specific, and
> in addition some of the power-related registers (SPA/CPA) take time to
> be updated. Uncontrolled access leads to timeouts or errors.
> 
> Add a mutex, shared by all links, so that all accesses to such
> registers are serialized, and follow a pattern of read-modify-write.
> 
> The mutex initialization is done at the higher layer since the same
> mutex is used for all links.
> 
> GitHub issue: https://github.com/thesofproject/linux/issues/1555
> Signed-off-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/soundwire/intel.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>  drivers/soundwire/intel.h |  2 ++
>  2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/soundwire/intel.c b/drivers/soundwire/intel.c
> index 1a3b828b03a1..3c271a8044b8 100644
> --- a/drivers/soundwire/intel.c
> +++ b/drivers/soundwire/intel.c
> @@ -286,6 +286,8 @@ static int intel_link_power_up(struct sdw_intel *sdw)
>  	int spa_mask, cpa_mask;
>  	int link_control, ret;
>  
> +	mutex_lock(sdw->link_res->shim_lock);
> +
>  	/* Link power up sequence */
>  	link_control = intel_readl(shim, SDW_SHIM_LCTL);
>  	spa_mask = (SDW_SHIM_LCTL_SPA << link_id);
> @@ -293,6 +295,8 @@ static int intel_link_power_up(struct sdw_intel *sdw)
>  	link_control |=  spa_mask;
>  
>  	ret = intel_set_bit(shim, SDW_SHIM_LCTL, link_control, cpa_mask);
> +	mutex_unlock(sdw->link_res->shim_lock);
> +
>  	if (ret < 0)
>  		return ret;
>  
> @@ -307,6 +311,8 @@ static int intel_shim_init(struct sdw_intel *sdw)
>  	int sync_reg, ret;
>  	u16 ioctl = 0, act = 0;
>  
> +	mutex_lock(sdw->link_res->shim_lock);
> +
>  	/* Initialize Shim */
>  	ioctl |= SDW_SHIM_IOCTL_BKE;
>  	intel_writew(shim, SDW_SHIM_IOCTL(link_id), ioctl);
> @@ -351,6 +357,8 @@ static int intel_shim_init(struct sdw_intel *sdw)
>  	sync_reg |= SDW_SHIM_SYNC_SYNCCPU;
>  	ret = intel_clear_bit(shim, SDW_SHIM_SYNC, sync_reg,
>  			      SDW_SHIM_SYNC_SYNCCPU);
> +	mutex_unlock(sdw->link_res->shim_lock);
> +
>  	if (ret < 0)
>  		dev_err(sdw->cdns.dev, "Failed to set sync period: %d\n", ret);
>  
> @@ -363,13 +371,15 @@ static void intel_shim_wake(struct sdw_intel *sdw, bool wake_enable)
>  	unsigned int link_id = sdw->instance;
>  	u16 wake_en, wake_sts;
>  
> +	mutex_lock(sdw->link_res->shim_lock);
> +	wake_en = intel_readw(shim, SDW_SHIM_WAKEEN);
> +
>  	if (wake_enable) {
>  		/* Enable the wakeup */
> -		intel_writew(shim, SDW_SHIM_WAKEEN,
> -			     (SDW_SHIM_WAKEEN_ENABLE << link_id));
> +		wake_en |= (SDW_SHIM_WAKEEN_ENABLE << link_id);
> +		intel_writew(shim, SDW_SHIM_WAKEEN, wake_en);
>  	} else {
>  		/* Disable the wake up interrupt */
> -		wake_en = intel_readw(shim, SDW_SHIM_WAKEEN);
>  		wake_en &= ~(SDW_SHIM_WAKEEN_ENABLE << link_id);
>  		intel_writew(shim, SDW_SHIM_WAKEEN, wake_en);
>  
> @@ -378,6 +388,7 @@ static void intel_shim_wake(struct sdw_intel *sdw, bool wake_enable)
>  		wake_sts |= (SDW_SHIM_WAKEEN_ENABLE << link_id);
>  		intel_writew(shim, SDW_SHIM_WAKESTS_STATUS, wake_sts);
>  	}
> +	mutex_unlock(sdw->link_res->shim_lock);
>  }
>  
>  static int intel_link_power_down(struct sdw_intel *sdw)
> @@ -387,6 +398,8 @@ static int intel_link_power_down(struct sdw_intel *sdw)
>  	void __iomem *shim = sdw->link_res->shim;
>  	u16 ioctl;
>  
> +	mutex_lock(sdw->link_res->shim_lock);
> +
>  	/* Glue logic */
>  	ioctl = intel_readw(shim, SDW_SHIM_IOCTL(link_id));
>  	ioctl |= SDW_SHIM_IOCTL_BKE;
> @@ -403,6 +416,8 @@ static int intel_link_power_down(struct sdw_intel *sdw)
>  	link_control &=  spa_mask;
>  
>  	ret = intel_clear_bit(shim, SDW_SHIM_LCTL, link_control, cpa_mask);
> +	mutex_unlock(sdw->link_res->shim_lock);
> +
>  	if (ret < 0)
>  		return ret;
>  
> @@ -630,11 +645,15 @@ static int intel_pre_bank_switch(struct sdw_bus *bus)
>  	if (!bus->multi_link)
>  		return 0;
>  
> +	mutex_lock(sdw->link_res->shim_lock);
> +
>  	/* Read SYNC register */
>  	sync_reg = intel_readl(shim, SDW_SHIM_SYNC);
>  	sync_reg |= SDW_SHIM_SYNC_CMDSYNC << sdw->instance;
>  	intel_writel(shim, SDW_SHIM_SYNC, sync_reg);
>  
> +	mutex_unlock(sdw->link_res->shim_lock);
> +
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> @@ -649,6 +668,8 @@ static int intel_post_bank_switch(struct sdw_bus *bus)
>  	if (!bus->multi_link)
>  		return 0;
>  
> +	mutex_lock(sdw->link_res->shim_lock);
> +
>  	/* Read SYNC register */
>  	sync_reg = intel_readl(shim, SDW_SHIM_SYNC);
>  
> @@ -660,9 +681,10 @@ static int intel_post_bank_switch(struct sdw_bus *bus)
>  	 *
>  	 * So, set the SYNCGO bit only if CMDSYNC bit is set for any Master.
>  	 */
> -	if (!(sync_reg & SDW_SHIM_SYNC_CMDSYNC_MASK))
> -		return 0;
> -
> +	if (!(sync_reg & SDW_SHIM_SYNC_CMDSYNC_MASK)) {
> +		ret = 0;
> +		goto unlock;
> +	}
>  	/*
>  	 * Set SyncGO bit to synchronously trigger a bank switch for
>  	 * all the masters. A write to SYNCGO bit clears CMDSYNC bit for all
> @@ -672,6 +694,9 @@ static int intel_post_bank_switch(struct sdw_bus *bus)
>  
>  	ret = intel_clear_bit(shim, SDW_SHIM_SYNC, sync_reg,
>  			      SDW_SHIM_SYNC_SYNCGO);
> +unlock:
> +	mutex_unlock(sdw->link_res->shim_lock);
> +
>  	if (ret < 0)
>  		dev_err(sdw->cdns.dev, "Post bank switch failed: %d\n", ret);
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/soundwire/intel.h b/drivers/soundwire/intel.h
> index 38b7c125fb10..568c84a80d79 100644
> --- a/drivers/soundwire/intel.h
> +++ b/drivers/soundwire/intel.h
> @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
>   * @irq: Interrupt line
>   * @ops: Shim callback ops
>   * @dev: device implementing hw_params and free callbacks
> + * @shim_lock: mutex to handle access to shared SHIM registers
>   */
>  struct sdw_intel_link_res {
>  	struct platform_device *pdev;
> @@ -25,6 +26,7 @@ struct sdw_intel_link_res {
>  	int irq;
>  	const struct sdw_intel_ops *ops;
>  	struct device *dev;
> +	struct mutex *shim_lock; /* protect shared registers */

Where is this mutex initialized? Did you test this...

-- 
~Vinod

  reply	other threads:[~2020-03-20 13:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-11 22:10 [PATCH 0/7] SoundWire: intel: fix SHIM programming sequences Pierre-Louis Bossart
2020-03-11 22:10 ` [PATCH 1/7] soundwire: intel: add helpers for link power down and shim wake Pierre-Louis Bossart
2020-03-11 22:10 ` [PATCH 2/7] soundwire: intel: reuse code for wait loops to set/clear bits Pierre-Louis Bossart
2020-03-20 13:38   ` Vinod Koul
2020-03-11 22:10 ` [PATCH 3/7] soundwire: intel: add mutex to prevent concurrent access to SHIM registers Pierre-Louis Bossart
2020-03-20 13:41   ` Vinod Koul [this message]
2020-03-20 14:07     ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2020-03-23 12:18       ` Vinod Koul
2020-03-11 22:10 ` [PATCH 4/7] soundwire: intel: add definitions for shim_mask Pierre-Louis Bossart
2020-03-20 13:42   ` Vinod Koul
2020-03-20 14:13     ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2020-03-23 12:28       ` Vinod Koul
2020-03-11 22:10 ` [PATCH 5/7] soundwire: intel: follow documentation sequences for SHIM registers Pierre-Louis Bossart
2020-03-20 13:51   ` Vinod Koul
2020-03-20 14:20     ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2020-03-23 12:31       ` Vinod Koul
2020-03-11 22:10 ` [PATCH 6/7] soundwire: intel: introduce a helper to arm link synchronization Pierre-Louis Bossart
2020-03-11 22:10 ` [PATCH 7/7] soundwire: intel: introduce helper for " Pierre-Louis Bossart

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200320134112.GC4885@vkoul-mobl \
    --to=vkoul@kernel.org \
    --cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hui.wang@canonical.com \
    --cc=jank@cadence.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=rander.wang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=sanyog.r.kale@intel.com \
    --cc=slawomir.blauciak@intel.com \
    --cc=srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org \
    --cc=tiwai@suse.de \
    --cc=yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox