From: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] KVM: VMX: Always VMCLEAR in-use VMCSes during crash with kexec support
Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2020 07:55:51 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200321145551.GA12329@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200228145942.GA2329@linux.intel.com>
On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 06:59:43AM -0800, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 11:16:10AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > On 27/02/20 23:30, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > > -void loaded_vmcs_init(struct loaded_vmcs *loaded_vmcs)
> > > +void loaded_vmcs_init(struct loaded_vmcs *loaded_vmcs, bool in_use)
> > > {
> > > vmcs_clear(loaded_vmcs->vmcs);
> > > if (loaded_vmcs->shadow_vmcs && loaded_vmcs->launched)
> > > vmcs_clear(loaded_vmcs->shadow_vmcs);
> > > +
> > > + if (in_use) {
> > > + list_del(&loaded_vmcs->loaded_vmcss_on_cpu_link);
> > > +
> > > + /*
> > > + * Ensure deleting loaded_vmcs from its current percpu list
> > > + * completes before setting loaded_vmcs->vcpu to -1, otherwise
> > > + * a different cpu can see vcpu == -1 first and add loaded_vmcs
> > > + * to its percpu list before it's deleted from this cpu's list.
> > > + * Pairs with the smp_rmb() in vmx_vcpu_load_vmcs().
> > > + */
> > > + smp_wmb();
> > > + }
> > > +
> >
> > I'd like to avoid the new in_use argument and, also, I think it's a
> > little bit nicer to always invoke the memory barrier. Even though we
> > use "asm volatile" for vmclear and therefore the compiler is already
> > taken care of, in principle it's more correct to order the ->cpu write
> > against vmclear's.
>
> Completely agree on all points. I wanted to avoid in_use as well, but it
> didn't occur to me to use list_empty()...
>
> > This gives the following patch on top:
>
> Looks good.
>
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> > index c9d6152e7a4d..77a64110577b 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> > @@ -656,25 +656,24 @@ static int vmx_set_guest_msr(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx, struct shared_msr_entry *msr,
> > return ret;
> > }
> >
> > -void loaded_vmcs_init(struct loaded_vmcs *loaded_vmcs, bool in_use)
> > +void loaded_vmcs_init(struct loaded_vmcs *loaded_vmcs)
> > {
> > vmcs_clear(loaded_vmcs->vmcs);
> > if (loaded_vmcs->shadow_vmcs && loaded_vmcs->launched)
> > vmcs_clear(loaded_vmcs->shadow_vmcs);
> >
> > - if (in_use) {
> > + if (!list_empty(&loaded_vmcs->loaded_vmcss_on_cpu_link))
Circling back to this, an even better option is to drop loaded_vmcs_init()
and open code the required pieces in __loaded_vmcs_clear() and
alloc_loaded_vmcs(). Those are the only two callers, and the latter
doesn't need to VMCLEAR the shadow VMCS (guaranteed to be NULL) and
obviously doesn't need the list manipulation of smp_wmb().
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-21 14:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-27 22:30 [PATCH 0/3] KVM: VMX: Fix for kexec VMCLEAR and VMXON cleanup Sean Christopherson
2020-02-27 22:30 ` [PATCH 1/3] KVM: VMX: Always VMCLEAR in-use VMCSes during crash with kexec support Sean Christopherson
2020-02-28 10:16 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-02-28 14:59 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-03-21 14:55 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2020-02-27 22:30 ` [PATCH 2/3] KVM: VMX: Gracefully handle faults on VMXON Sean Christopherson
2020-02-27 22:30 ` [PATCH 3/3] KVM: VMX: Make loaded_vmcs_init() a static function Sean Christopherson
2020-02-28 11:02 ` [PATCH 0/3] KVM: VMX: Fix for kexec VMCLEAR and VMXON cleanup Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200321145551.GA12329@linux.intel.com \
--to=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox