public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
To: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Michael S . Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
	Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@intel.com>,
	"Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>,
	Christophe de Dinechin <dinechin@redhat.com>,
	Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
	Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>,
	Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 06/14] KVM: Make dirty ring exclusive to dirty bitmap log
Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2020 12:12:50 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200321191250.GB13851@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200318163720.93929-7-peterx@redhat.com>

On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 12:37:12PM -0400, Peter Xu wrote:
> There's no good reason to use both the dirty bitmap logging and the
> new dirty ring buffer to track dirty bits.  We should be able to even
> support both of them at the same time, but it could complicate things
> which could actually help little.  Let's simply make it the rule
> before we enable dirty ring on any arch, that we don't allow these two
> interfaces to be used together.
> 
> The big world switch would be KVM_CAP_DIRTY_LOG_RING capability
> enablement.  That's where we'll switch from the default dirty logging
> way to the dirty ring way.  As long as kvm->dirty_ring_size is setup
> correctly, we'll once and for all switch to the dirty ring buffer mode
> for the current virtual machine.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst |  7 +++++++
>  virt/kvm/kvm_main.c            | 12 ++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 19 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst b/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst
> index 99ee9cfc20c4..8f3a83298d3f 100644
> --- a/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst
> @@ -6202,3 +6202,10 @@ make sure all the existing dirty gfns are flushed to the dirty rings.
>  
>  The dirty ring can gets full.  When it happens, the KVM_RUN of the
>  vcpu will return with exit reason KVM_EXIT_DIRTY_LOG_FULL.
> +
> +NOTE: the KVM_CAP_DIRTY_LOG_RING capability and the new ioctl

Leave off "new", it'll be stale a few months/years from now.

> +KVM_RESET_DIRTY_RINGS are exclusive to the existing KVM_GET_DIRTY_LOG

Did you mean "mutually exclusive with"?  "exclusive to" would mean they
can only be used by KVM_GET_DIRTY_LOG with doesn't match the next
sentence.

> +interface.  After enabling KVM_CAP_DIRTY_LOG_RING with an acceptable
> +dirty ring size, the virtual machine will switch to the dirty ring
> +tracking mode, and KVM_GET_DIRTY_LOG, KVM_CLEAR_DIRTY_LOG ioctls will
> +stop working.
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> index 54a1e893d17b..b289d3bddd5c 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> @@ -1352,6 +1352,10 @@ int kvm_get_dirty_log(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_dirty_log *log,
>  	unsigned long n;
>  	unsigned long any = 0;
>  
> +	/* Dirty ring tracking is exclusive to dirty log tracking */
> +	if (kvm->dirty_ring_size)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
>  	*memslot = NULL;
>  	*is_dirty = 0;
>  
> @@ -1413,6 +1417,10 @@ static int kvm_get_dirty_log_protect(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_dirty_log *log)
>  	unsigned long *dirty_bitmap_buffer;
>  	bool flush;
>  
> +	/* Dirty ring tracking is exclusive to dirty log tracking */
> +	if (kvm->dirty_ring_size)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
>  	as_id = log->slot >> 16;
>  	id = (u16)log->slot;
>  	if (as_id >= KVM_ADDRESS_SPACE_NUM || id >= KVM_USER_MEM_SLOTS)
> @@ -1521,6 +1529,10 @@ static int kvm_clear_dirty_log_protect(struct kvm *kvm,
>  	unsigned long *dirty_bitmap_buffer;
>  	bool flush;
>  
> +	/* Dirty ring tracking is exclusive to dirty log tracking */
> +	if (kvm->dirty_ring_size)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
>  	as_id = log->slot >> 16;
>  	id = (u16)log->slot;
>  	if (as_id >= KVM_ADDRESS_SPACE_NUM || id >= KVM_USER_MEM_SLOTS)
> -- 
> 2.24.1
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2020-03-21 19:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-18 16:37 [PATCH v7 00/14] KVM: Dirty ring interface Peter Xu
2020-03-18 16:37 ` [PATCH v7 01/14] KVM: X86: Change parameter for fast_page_fault tracepoint Peter Xu
2020-03-18 16:37 ` [PATCH v7 02/14] KVM: Cache as_id in kvm_memory_slot Peter Xu
2020-03-18 16:37 ` [PATCH v7 03/14] KVM: X86: Don't track dirty for KVM_SET_[TSS_ADDR|IDENTITY_MAP_ADDR] Peter Xu
2020-03-21 19:22   ` Sean Christopherson
2020-03-23 14:58     ` Peter Xu
2020-03-23 15:42       ` Sean Christopherson
2020-03-23 16:26         ` Peter Xu
2020-03-23 16:55           ` Sean Christopherson
2020-03-23 17:13             ` Peter Xu
2020-03-18 16:37 ` [PATCH v7 04/14] KVM: Pass in kvm pointer into mark_page_dirty_in_slot() Peter Xu
2020-03-18 16:37 ` [PATCH v7 05/14] KVM: X86: Implement ring-based dirty memory tracking Peter Xu
2020-03-18 16:37 ` [PATCH v7 06/14] KVM: Make dirty ring exclusive to dirty bitmap log Peter Xu
2020-03-21 19:12   ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2020-03-23 16:16     ` Peter Xu
2020-03-18 16:37 ` [PATCH v7 07/14] KVM: Don't allocate dirty bitmap if dirty ring is enabled Peter Xu
2020-03-18 16:37 ` [PATCH v7 08/14] KVM: selftests: Always clear dirty bitmap after iteration Peter Xu
2020-03-18 16:37 ` [PATCH v7 09/14] KVM: selftests: Sync uapi/linux/kvm.h to tools/ Peter Xu
2020-03-18 16:37 ` [PATCH v7 10/14] KVM: selftests: Use a single binary for dirty/clear log test Peter Xu
2020-03-19  7:44   ` Andrew Jones
2020-03-18 16:37 ` [PATCH v7 11/14] KVM: selftests: Introduce after_vcpu_run hook for dirty " Peter Xu
2020-03-19  7:50   ` Andrew Jones
2020-03-19 16:37     ` Peter Xu
2020-03-18 16:37 ` [PATCH v7 12/14] KVM: selftests: Add dirty ring buffer test Peter Xu
2020-03-19 17:02   ` Peter Xu
2020-03-18 16:37 ` [PATCH v7 13/14] KVM: selftests: Let dirty_log_test async for dirty ring test Peter Xu
2020-03-18 16:37 ` [PATCH v7 14/14] KVM: selftests: Add "-c" parameter to dirty log test Peter Xu
2020-03-19  7:54   ` Andrew Jones

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200321191250.GB13851@linux.intel.com \
    --to=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
    --cc=dinechin@redhat.com \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    --cc=yan.y.zhao@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox