From: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
To: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Michael S . Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@intel.com>,
"Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>,
Christophe de Dinechin <dinechin@redhat.com>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>,
Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 06/14] KVM: Make dirty ring exclusive to dirty bitmap log
Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2020 12:12:50 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200321191250.GB13851@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200318163720.93929-7-peterx@redhat.com>
On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 12:37:12PM -0400, Peter Xu wrote:
> There's no good reason to use both the dirty bitmap logging and the
> new dirty ring buffer to track dirty bits. We should be able to even
> support both of them at the same time, but it could complicate things
> which could actually help little. Let's simply make it the rule
> before we enable dirty ring on any arch, that we don't allow these two
> interfaces to be used together.
>
> The big world switch would be KVM_CAP_DIRTY_LOG_RING capability
> enablement. That's where we'll switch from the default dirty logging
> way to the dirty ring way. As long as kvm->dirty_ring_size is setup
> correctly, we'll once and for all switch to the dirty ring buffer mode
> for the current virtual machine.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
> ---
> Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst | 7 +++++++
> virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 12 ++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst b/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst
> index 99ee9cfc20c4..8f3a83298d3f 100644
> --- a/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst
> @@ -6202,3 +6202,10 @@ make sure all the existing dirty gfns are flushed to the dirty rings.
>
> The dirty ring can gets full. When it happens, the KVM_RUN of the
> vcpu will return with exit reason KVM_EXIT_DIRTY_LOG_FULL.
> +
> +NOTE: the KVM_CAP_DIRTY_LOG_RING capability and the new ioctl
Leave off "new", it'll be stale a few months/years from now.
> +KVM_RESET_DIRTY_RINGS are exclusive to the existing KVM_GET_DIRTY_LOG
Did you mean "mutually exclusive with"? "exclusive to" would mean they
can only be used by KVM_GET_DIRTY_LOG with doesn't match the next
sentence.
> +interface. After enabling KVM_CAP_DIRTY_LOG_RING with an acceptable
> +dirty ring size, the virtual machine will switch to the dirty ring
> +tracking mode, and KVM_GET_DIRTY_LOG, KVM_CLEAR_DIRTY_LOG ioctls will
> +stop working.
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> index 54a1e893d17b..b289d3bddd5c 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> @@ -1352,6 +1352,10 @@ int kvm_get_dirty_log(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_dirty_log *log,
> unsigned long n;
> unsigned long any = 0;
>
> + /* Dirty ring tracking is exclusive to dirty log tracking */
> + if (kvm->dirty_ring_size)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> *memslot = NULL;
> *is_dirty = 0;
>
> @@ -1413,6 +1417,10 @@ static int kvm_get_dirty_log_protect(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_dirty_log *log)
> unsigned long *dirty_bitmap_buffer;
> bool flush;
>
> + /* Dirty ring tracking is exclusive to dirty log tracking */
> + if (kvm->dirty_ring_size)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> as_id = log->slot >> 16;
> id = (u16)log->slot;
> if (as_id >= KVM_ADDRESS_SPACE_NUM || id >= KVM_USER_MEM_SLOTS)
> @@ -1521,6 +1529,10 @@ static int kvm_clear_dirty_log_protect(struct kvm *kvm,
> unsigned long *dirty_bitmap_buffer;
> bool flush;
>
> + /* Dirty ring tracking is exclusive to dirty log tracking */
> + if (kvm->dirty_ring_size)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> as_id = log->slot >> 16;
> id = (u16)log->slot;
> if (as_id >= KVM_ADDRESS_SPACE_NUM || id >= KVM_USER_MEM_SLOTS)
> --
> 2.24.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-21 19:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-18 16:37 [PATCH v7 00/14] KVM: Dirty ring interface Peter Xu
2020-03-18 16:37 ` [PATCH v7 01/14] KVM: X86: Change parameter for fast_page_fault tracepoint Peter Xu
2020-03-18 16:37 ` [PATCH v7 02/14] KVM: Cache as_id in kvm_memory_slot Peter Xu
2020-03-18 16:37 ` [PATCH v7 03/14] KVM: X86: Don't track dirty for KVM_SET_[TSS_ADDR|IDENTITY_MAP_ADDR] Peter Xu
2020-03-21 19:22 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-03-23 14:58 ` Peter Xu
2020-03-23 15:42 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-03-23 16:26 ` Peter Xu
2020-03-23 16:55 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-03-23 17:13 ` Peter Xu
2020-03-18 16:37 ` [PATCH v7 04/14] KVM: Pass in kvm pointer into mark_page_dirty_in_slot() Peter Xu
2020-03-18 16:37 ` [PATCH v7 05/14] KVM: X86: Implement ring-based dirty memory tracking Peter Xu
2020-03-18 16:37 ` [PATCH v7 06/14] KVM: Make dirty ring exclusive to dirty bitmap log Peter Xu
2020-03-21 19:12 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2020-03-23 16:16 ` Peter Xu
2020-03-18 16:37 ` [PATCH v7 07/14] KVM: Don't allocate dirty bitmap if dirty ring is enabled Peter Xu
2020-03-18 16:37 ` [PATCH v7 08/14] KVM: selftests: Always clear dirty bitmap after iteration Peter Xu
2020-03-18 16:37 ` [PATCH v7 09/14] KVM: selftests: Sync uapi/linux/kvm.h to tools/ Peter Xu
2020-03-18 16:37 ` [PATCH v7 10/14] KVM: selftests: Use a single binary for dirty/clear log test Peter Xu
2020-03-19 7:44 ` Andrew Jones
2020-03-18 16:37 ` [PATCH v7 11/14] KVM: selftests: Introduce after_vcpu_run hook for dirty " Peter Xu
2020-03-19 7:50 ` Andrew Jones
2020-03-19 16:37 ` Peter Xu
2020-03-18 16:37 ` [PATCH v7 12/14] KVM: selftests: Add dirty ring buffer test Peter Xu
2020-03-19 17:02 ` Peter Xu
2020-03-18 16:37 ` [PATCH v7 13/14] KVM: selftests: Let dirty_log_test async for dirty ring test Peter Xu
2020-03-18 16:37 ` [PATCH v7 14/14] KVM: selftests: Add "-c" parameter to dirty log test Peter Xu
2020-03-19 7:54 ` Andrew Jones
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200321191250.GB13851@linux.intel.com \
--to=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
--cc=dinechin@redhat.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=yan.y.zhao@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox